Dylan's Visions of Sin. Christopher Ricks

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Dylan's Visions of Sin - Christopher Ricks страница 27

Автор:
Серия:
Издательство:
Dylan's Visions of Sin - Christopher Ricks

Скачать книгу

worker working”, and as suggesting that the preacher not only has spiritual pride but preaches it. He may think that he is preaching against pride, but this is not what actually happens as soon as he opens his ripe and fruity mouth.

      And then there is scattered another flurry of darts. Preacher is in touch with councilman, because of what council is. Taking bribes is in touch with cut, because of what it is to take a cut (my usual percentage, I trust?). Taking bribes on the side is in touch with somebody’s mistress, because of what The Oxford English Dictionary knows carnally about on the side: “surreptitiously, without acknowledgement. (Freq. with connotation of dishonesty: illicitly; outside wedlock.)”. “What would some of you say if I told you that I, as a married man, have had three women on the side?” (1968). In the momentum from this verse into the refrain (a mounting momentum now), there is twice a “somebody” before hitting the refrain:

      You may be somebody’s mistress, may be somebody’s heir

      But you’re gonna have to serve somebody, yes

      You’re gonna have to serve somebody

      Well, it may be the devil, or it may be the Lord

      But you’re gonna have to serve somebody

      The verse that follows is both the seed of the song and – because of the Sermon on the Mount – its flower.

      And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: and yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.

      “Might like to wear cotton, might like to wear silk”: Dylan sings this quatrain most elegantly, with an equable commitment to its being so pat, rhythmically and vocally and syntactically, so symmetrical. The bed may be king-sized but it is a perfect fit. The danger of the fit and of the pat could not be better intimated (complacency completely self-satisfied), intimated delicately to the point of daintiness, but without palliation. For the “But” is biding its time.

      Might like to wear cotton, might like to wear silk

      Might like to drink whiskey, might like to drink milk

      Might like to eat caviar, you might like to eat bread

      May be sleeping on the floor, sleeping in a king-sized bed

      But you’re gonna have to serve somebody . . .

      And so the song moves to its moving on. The turn that finally releases it from its perpetual motion is its decision to switch from what you may be, and what they may call you, to what you may call me – and thence to what little difference this could ever make, given the inescapable truth of our all having to serve somebody. Earlier the song had dangled titles and entitlements: “They may call you Doctor or they may call you Chief ”. They may call you these things servilely, but don’t forget that you, too, are gonna have to serve somebody. “They may call you . . .” now returns, from the opposite direction, as “You may call me . . .”

      You may call me Terry, you may call me Timmy

      You may call me Bobby, or you may call me Zimmy

      You may call me R. J., you may call me Ray

      You may call me anything, no matter what you say

      You’re still gonna have to serve somebody, yes

      You’re gonna have to serve somebody

      Well, it may be the devil, or it may be the Lord

      But you’re gonna have to serve somebody

      On every previous occasion, not only the last line of the refrain but its first line had crystallized in an opening obdurate “But”. Dylan has always respected the patient power of life’s most important little insister, “But”, which will not be cheated or defeated. To bring the song to an end, while urging us not to forget the unending truth of its asseveration, there is this time no opening “But”, only the conclusive one.119

      You’re gonna have to serve somebody. You may not like the thought, but there are forms of the thought that ought to do more than reconcile you to it. At Morning Prayer, the Second Collect, for Peace:

      O God, who art the author of peace and lover of concord, in knowledge of whom standeth our eternal life, whose service is perfect freedom; Defend us thy humble servants in all assaults of our enemies.

      Thy humble servants, thou whose service is perfect freedom. It is perfectly paradoxical, like so much else.

      Meanwhile, the crasser forms of covetousness keep up their assaults. The artist seeks to defend us against them.

      You can’t take it with you and you know that it’s too worthless to be sold

      They tell you, “Time is money” as if your life was worth its weight in gold

      (When You Gonna Wake Up?)

      It is one of the most enduring of proverbial reminders, You can’t take it with you. In the different accents of St Paul:

      For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. And having food and raiment let us be therewith content. But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.

      (1 Timothy 6:7–10)

      They tell you, “Time is money” as if your life was worth its weight in gold

      Not that any of these matters are as simple as the confident repudiation of covetousness would like to believe. The realist Samuel Butler would again like to say a word: It is only very fortunate people whose time is money. My time is not money. I wish it was. It is not even somebody else’s money. If it was he would give me some of it. I am a miserable, unmarketable sinner, and there is no money in me.120

       Sad-Eyed Lady of the Lowlands

      Sad to say, there has been many a sad-eyed lady. One of the most haunting, and haunted, is Dolores, she whose very name means sadness.121 Swinburne’s Dolores (1866) opens with her hidden eyes, and soon moves to her flagrant mouth, all this then issuing in a question:

      Cold eyelids that hide like a jewel

      Hard eyes that grow soft for an hour;

      The heavy white limbs, and the cruel

      Red mouth like a venomous flower;

      When these are gone by with their glories,

      What shall rest of thee then, what remain,

      O mystic and sombre Dolores,

      Our Lady of Pain?

      He covets her, even as she covets so much.

      Sad-Eyed Lady of the Lowlands opens with the mouth of our lady of pain, and soon moves to her eyes, all this then issuing in a question,

Скачать книгу