The sacred rite of baptism is administered in a great number of churches to little infants upon the sponsorship of their guardians or friends, while many of us consider that Holy Scripture teaches that believers only (without respect to their age at all) are the proper subjects of baptism, and that after a personal profession of their faith in Christ. I see a man take up an unconscious infant in his arms, and he says he baptizes it. When I turn to my Bible, I can see nothing whatever of this sort there. It is true I find the Lord Jesus saying, “Permit the little children to come to me,” but that affords no precedent for carrying a little child to the minister, that could not come, that was too young to walk, much less to think and understand the meaning of these things. Yet more, when Jesus said “Permit little children to come to me, and do not forbid them, for of such is the kingdom of heaven” — they came to him; but I do not find that he baptized or sprinkled them at all, he gave them his blessing and they went away. I am sure he did not baptize them, for it is expressly said, “Jesus Christ did not baptize, but his disciples did.” So, then it is quite clear that passage does not favour the Paedobaptist. I am informed, however, that the reason why children are baptized is, that we are told in the Bible that Abraham’s children were circumcised. This puzzles me. I cannot see any similarity at all between the two things. But who were the people circumcised? They were Israelites. Why were they circumcised? Because they were Israelites. That is the reason; and I say I would not hesitate to baptize any Christian, though he is a babe in Christ, as soon as he knows the Lord Jesus Christ, even if he would only be eight days old in the faith, if he proves that he is an Israelite in the spirit himself, I will baptize him. I have nothing to do with his father or his mother in religion. Religion is a personal act all the way through; another man cannot believe for me, cannot repent for me; and another person cannot give for me the answer of a good conscience toward God in baptism and have it done in my name. We must act on our own individual responsibility in religion by the grace of God, or else the thing is virtually not done at all. Now I believe many godly people do sincerely worship God at this altar of infant baptism; but I am equally clear that it is my duty to do my utmost to break it down, for it is not God’s altar; God’s altar is believers’ baptism. What did Philip say to the Eunuch? “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” “Lo! here is water,” said the Eunuch. Yes, but that was not all; there must be faith, as well as water, before there could be legitimate baptism; and every baptism that is administered to any man, except he asks for it himself, on the profession of his faith in Christ, is an altar at which I could not worship, for I do not believe it to be the altar of God, but an altar originally built at Rome, the pattern of which has been adopted here, to the marring of the union of the church, and to the great injury of souls. Now, all I ask from those who differ from me in opinion is, simply to look at the matter honestly and calmly. If they can find infant baptism in the Bible, then let them practise it and worship there; if they cannot, let them be honest, and come and worship at the altar of Jerusalem, and there alone. An old woman was once promised a Bible, if she could find a text that sanctioned infant baptism. She could only find one, and that was, “Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man, for the Lord’s sake.” The minister gave her the Bible for her ingenuity, admitting, that it was an ordinance of man, and no mistake.
15. I quote this instance of infant baptism, as only one out of many corruptions that have crept into our churches. It is quite clear that all sects cannot be right. They may be right as to the main points essential for salvation, though in their discrepancies with one another they betray errors. I do not want you to believe that I am right; rather turn to Scripture, and see what is right. The day must come when Episcopacy, Independency, Wesleyanism, and every other system, must be judged by the Word of God, and every form given up that is not approved before the Most High. I hope I shall always be able to lift up my voice against that tolerance growing up in our midst, which is not only a tolerance towards people, but a tolerance towards doctrines. I have fervent love towards every brother in Christ who differs from me. I love him for Christ’s sake, and hold fellowship with him for the truth’s sake: but I can have no tolerance for his errors, nor do I wish him to have any for mine. I tell him straight to his face, “If your sentiments contradict mine, either I am right and you are wrong, or you are right and I am wrong; and it is time we should meet together and search the Word of God, to see what is right.” Talk of your Evangelical Alliances, and such like: they will never endure; they may effect many blessed purposes, but they are not the remedy that is needed for our divisions. What is needed is, for all of us to come to the model of the Word of God, and when we have come to that, we must come together. Let us all come “to the law and to the testimony.” Let the Baptist, let the Independent, let the Churchman, lay aside his old thoughts, his old prejudices, and his old traditions, and let each man search for himself, as in the sight of Almighty God, and some of the altars must go down, for they cannot all be after the divine type, when their dissimilarity is so palpable. May the Spirit of God be poured out in this land, and there will come a threefold reformation, such as I have described; broken images, groves cut down, and fallen altars scattered to the winds. And yet, my dear hearers, I do not ask you to attend to this last thing first. It is unimportant, compared with the first. The images are first to be burned, then sinful customs are to be given up, and after that let the church be reformed. Each of these in its proper place and due order is important, and all must be attended to. Yet once more, my hearer, before I send you away let me put one pertinent and pressing question to you. What have you received by all your hearing of God’s Word? Some of you have heard sermons beyond count; you can hardly remember the number of gospel ministers to whom you have listened. What good have you obtained as the result of them all? Have you been led to repentance? Have you been brought to faith? Are you made “a child of God and an heir of the kingdom of heaven.” If not, I solemnly remind you that all your church goings and chapel goings are increasing your condemnation. Unless you repent, these privileges shall rise up in judgment against you to condemn you. Woe to you, London, woe to you, for if the words which have been preached in your streets had been proclaimed in Sodom and Gomorrah, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. Woe to you, you sons and daughters of pious parents, children trained in the Sunday School, hearers of God’s Word; for “except you repent, it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for you.” “I speak as to wise men; judge what I say,” and may God guide you rightly.
Jacob And Esau
No. 239-5:113. A Sermon Delivered On Sunday Evening, January 16, 1859, By C. H. Spurgeon, At New Park Street Chapel, Southwark.
I have loved Jacob, but I have hated Esau. {Romans 9:13}
1. Do not imagine for an instant that I pretend to be able thoroughly to elucidate the great mysteries of predestination. There are some men who claim to know all about the matter. They twist it around their fingers as easily as if it would be an everyday thing; but depend upon it, he who thinks he knows all about this mystery, knows only a very little. It is only the shallowness of his mind that permits him to see the bottom of his knowledge; he who dives deep, finds that there is in the lowest depth to which he can attain a deeper depth still. The fact is, that the great questions about man’s responsibility, free will, and predestination, have been fought over, and over, and over again, and have been answered in ten thousand different ways; and the result has been, that we know just as much about the matter as when we first began. The combatants have thrown dust into each other’s eyes, and have hindered each other from seeing; and then they have concluded, that because they put other people’s eyes out, therefore they could see.
2. Now, it is one thing to refute another man’s doctrine, but a very different matter to establish my own views. It is very easy to knock down one man’s hypothesis concerning these truths, not quite as easy to make my own stand on a firm footing. I shall try tonight, if I can, to go safely, if I do not go very fast; for I shall endeavour to keep simply to the letter of God’s Word. I think that if we kept more simply to the teachings of the Bible, we would be wiser than we are; for by turning from the heavenly light of revelation, and trusting in the deceitful will-oh-the-wisps of our own imagination, we thrust ourselves into quags and bogs where there is no sure footing, and we begin to sink; and instead of making progress, we find ourselves
