At my recommendation, Bosch bought out Bell and Howell’s interest and the company was renamed Robert Bosch Corporation, Fernseh Division.
Chairez adds:
We started the 1982 NAB show with name tags that had Bell & Howell/Bosch but ended the show with name tags with Bosch Fernseh.
Butler had been brough to Fernseh to streamline the US operations.
Fernseh (US) did make several important contributions to the overall Fernseh operation. First was the shorter development time, which allowed an early market entry. Several products were developed and manufactured by Salt Lake for international sales.
Second we implemented Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II), known today as the Demming method, which had been adopted by Japanese auto exporters in the late '60s. This gave us huge improvements in cost, on-time delivery and quality. The Salt Lake operation was one of the early US adapters of Demming, made possible by our close continuing association with the Bell & Howell manufacturing chief.
Butler recalls the next move:
Jim had come up with a design for a new system to improve on the Mach One. It incorporated a lot of the unique features such as the Active EDL and full Look-Ahead Search capability. He went to Bosch with the design.
Despite its introduction into PAL broadcast markets and Adams' new design, Mach One didn't fit with Fernseh's plans. Butler moved Chairez to Los Angles to work in Fernseh’s outside sales with companies like Chyron then made a tough decision on the man who had created the editing system.
We decided to end new development of the Mach One. I had known Jim as a key member of my engineering team at CMX Systems a decade earlier so I wished him well and released all rights of the Mach One intellectual property to him.
Jim Adams joined with development partners Joe Swiderski & Mike Shetter and sought out a new backer for their next generation editing system. Bill Butler left Fernseh in 1982 yet still had a major role to play in editing's history.
COMPEDITOR
Sun-1 was the first generation of UNIX computer workstations and servers produced by Sun Microsystems (Stanford University Network) launched in May 1982. John Seamons, who co-designed the Sun-1 ethernet interface, now worked in the Lucasfilm Computer Division nearby Ralph Guggenheim’s team:
When John arrived at Lucasfilm, he "evangelized" the SUN product line and we became one of their first customers.
The power of the UNIX based computers allowed the editing group to experiment with features that had been deemed impossible with the PERQ powered ‘Dodo’. The new Sun driven device became known as the Compeditor.
Meanwhile another Lucasfilm programmer had written a software tool that became critical to the editing group. Malcolm Blanchard had created a program that was able to bring together all of the disparate information, that related to film and video clips at Lucasfilm, into an accessible and ordered format. Built from the ground up the ‘SiBYL’ program could track a motion picture film’s progress from camera rushes through special effects and all post production stages.
Blanchard recalls:
The architecture of the asset management system I built for ILM consisted of a general-purpose database management system, a schema that described the data ILM needed managed and a user interface to interact with it. All of which I wrote from scratch. Sibyl was the DBMS. It was similar in function as today’s Oracle and Sybase systems, though those systems are much more scalable and robust than Sibyl ever dreamed of.
The ability to cross relate video clone time codes and link them to original film key numbers and edge numbers was critical to a future editing system. Guggenheim recalls:
Malcolm and I had been officemates in the early days of the Lucasfilm Computer Division and we remained close friends. I was very aware of his work on SiBYL. When he was about to wrap up his work on the ILM version of this database software, I enlisted him to come over and work with us and integrate it into the editing system
Such a tool could potentially solve Ralph Guggenheim's biggest headache, the ability to playback video clips with the same flexibility of film editing systems. He hoped that a re-purposed SiBYL could organize clips into ‘bins’ and then from there an editor could select more specific frames to be played in a 'sequence' or 'schedule'.
Blanchard adds:
SiBYL stayed the same. The work for Editdroid was to write a new scheme and user interface. The Compeditor/Editdroid scheme was similar to ILM’s in that it described film clips. There was some additional information to allow accessing a clip on the electronic media and we needed to add the ability to describe the edit list. All that was pretty straight forward. The hardest part was designing and implementing the user interface.
The ILM interface was text based. Compeditor had a graphical interface and this was the first time I had worked with one. The possibilities were enormous and there weren’t any precedents to copy. I think I spent about a year, maybe two, working on the project. The vast majority of that time was working on the UI.
While the new UNIX based systems at Lucasfilm were better than the ageing Perqs, they created another problem to solve. Clark Higgins recalls:
You hit a button to stop or start the videodisc player and it would take a half second to respond. I knew this was going to be an issue with film editors and even video editors who were able to get instant feedback from their decks with the Sony BVE or Convergence systems. You need to get a tactile response to jogging and moving through frames and the UNIX operating system couldn’t deliver that.
George Lucas had allocated $10m in funding for the Computer Division but despite its ground breaking research, the team was far from creating commercial products. Bob Greber and Roger Faxon looked to hire a manager who could bring a business sense to the various research projects.Robert (Bob) Doris recalls:
I was back working at BCG when I received a call from a headhunter who said she represented a company in need of a division general manager. They wanted someone with a business and legal background. That person was to look at technologies that the company had developed in-house and work with existing staff to turn that work first into commercially viable products and then license it to third parties.
That sounded interesting but … they didn’t want to hire anybody with too much experience because that would be too expensive. Of course I didn’t know who the client was during the initial part of the conversation but the headhunter let me know eventually that it was a major film company.
To be honest I was a little incredulous because it didn’t seem to make sense. Here was a major film company looking to revolutionize film and sound editing technologies as well as re-invent computer graphics. I had enough experience in computers and technology from university and my own computer start up to know what was being done at that time in the film and computer industries. And that was relatively primitive.
I had
