The Fatal Cup: Thomas Griffiths Wainewright and the strange deaths of his relations. John Price Williams

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Fatal Cup: Thomas Griffiths Wainewright and the strange deaths of his relations - John Price Williams страница 3

The Fatal Cup: Thomas Griffiths Wainewright and the strange deaths of his relations - John Price Williams

Скачать книгу

Public Libraries

      THE FATAL CUP

      12

      His opinion was much the same as that expressed by defence witnesses at Bow Street Court in London more than 200 years later, when the Magistrate ordered 171 paperback copies to be forfeited under the Obscene Publications Act.

      By his second wife, Griffiths had two daughters; the first died as a child, the second in childbirth. This was Ann, pretty and highly-intelligent who had married at the age of 19, Thomas Wainewright of Sloane Street, Chelsea. The marriage is recorded in the registers of Chiswick Parish Church:

      Thomas Wainewright, Esquire, of the Parish of St. Luke, Chelsea, in the County of Middlesex, Bachelor, and Ann Griffiths, of the Parish of Chiswick in the same County, Spinster, a Minor, by and with the lawful consent of Ralph Griffiths, Esquire, the natural and lawful father of the said Minor, were married by licence this 13th day of December 1792, by me, James Trebeck A.M., Vicar.

      The young couple lived at Chiswick, probably at Linden House with Dr. Griffiths; the mansion was big enough for them all. But he had not approved of the marriage, according to the Dictionary of National Biography, despite giving his consent. Then tragedy; on October 11, 1794, after being married for fewer than two years, Ann died giving birth to a son. Dr Griffiths, who was by then 74, had lost a daughter and gained a grandson on the same day.

      He was christened Thomas after his father and Griffiths after his grandfather; his mother Ann was

      JOHN PRICE WILLIAMS

      13

      the first of many people close to him who were to die suddenly.

      The Gentleman’s Magazine noted her death in its Obituary of Notable Persons:

       She is greatly regretted on account of her amiable disposition and uncommon accomplishments. She is supposed to have understood the writings of Mr.Locke as well as, perhaps, any person of either sex now living.

      Uncommon indeed in Georgian England for a woman of 21 to be a recognised authority on the works of a philosopher, but being brought up at table with the cream of literary London she would have had a rare and unusual grasp of such matters and had her father’s huge library at her disposal.

      The baby was left to be brought up by his grandparents and his father – a lawyer, one of the 12 children of a prosperous solicitor of Hatton Garden. Like his wife, he too, died young, a few years later, leaving the young Thomas an orphan, but in the care of his wealthy but aged grandparents.

      It was before he was nine, for in Dr. Griffiths’ will, dated June 1803, the boy’s father is referred to as “the late”. It was a very strange will that Dr. Griffiths made in June that year, four months before his own death at the age of 83.

      IN THE PREROGATIVE COURT OF CANTERBURY

      This is the last Will and Testament of me, Ralph Griffiths, of Turnham Green, in the

      THE FATAL CUP

      14

      County of Middlesex, Doctor of Laws. Whereas on the marriage of my late daughter, Ann Griffiths, with the late Thomas Wainewright Esquire, I advanced a certain sum of money and covenanted that after my death a further sum should be paid by my personal representatives as a marriage portion for my said daughter and whereas my grandson Thomas Wainewright is become entitled to such property so advanced by me to his mother my Will that neither he the said Thomas Wainewright nor his trustees for him shall demand any further sum out of my estate as I hereby declare that the sum already paid with that which is covenanted to be paid is all that I intend for my said grandson. And with regard to the rest and residue of my estate and effects of what kind of nature soever it is my Will and intention that the same should be divided according to the statute for the distributions between my wife and my son George Edward Griffiths, and that I should die intestate save and except as to what I have declared regarding my said grandson Thomas Wainewright.

      In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal this seventh day of June in the year of Our Lord one thousand eight hundred and three.”

      This is unlikely, at his great age, to have been his first will. Why did he go to such lengths to ensure that his young grandson would get not a penny more than he had settled on his dead daughter and husband?

       There is some evidence that the bluff doctor - described by John Forster, the biographer of

      JOHN PRICE WILLIAMS

      15

      Dickens as “a mean-spirited tyrant” - had developed a dislike of the young orphan who roamed the corridors of Linden House. He is named in the will twice as Thomas Wainewright; his second Christian name – Griffiths – which came from his grandfather himself, is omitted. It seems almost as though the old man were trying to disown him. It would have irked him mightily if he had known that one day the lad would inherit the lot.

      It has been suggested that the young Wainewright might already have been showing a childish cunning which turned his grandfather against him. But of this, of course, there is no proof.

      The bequest that did come to the boy was £5,000 invested at the Bank of England in Navy five per cent annuities – his greed and reckless spending when he plundered the inheritance years later was to cause his downfall. The settlement was in the name of three trustees: his uncle, Robert Wainewright; Edward Smith Foss a relative on his mother's side, and Foss's, son, also Edward, whom Wainewright regarded as a cousin. Under the terms of the will, Wainewright could not touch the capital at any time; all he could draw on was the dividends of £250 a year (£23,500). What is more, the capital would never come to him. The trusteeship would continue for his descendants. But that annual income, guaranteed by the Bank of England was enough to keep him in some style - the wage of a labourer in England, with no guarantee of employment was not much more than £20 a year.

      The restriction in the will was to set Wainewright on the road to crime. For what could be more galling for the debt-ridden profligate he was to become, than to have a considerable sum of money just out

      THE FATAL CUP

      16

      of reach – money which he regarded morally as being his own? The frustration and the temptation were to become so unbearable that he was willing to risk a death sentence by swindling the Bank of England and then to gain from mysterious deaths of his relatives.

      With old Dr. Griffiths gone, Wainewright was brought up by his grandmother the shrewish, hard-headed business woman, who died in 1812, and her son George, an amiable easy-going bachelor and dabbler in the arts who took up the editorship of the Monthly Review.

      George’s delights were planting tropical trees and building new conservatories in the grounds of Linden House. By 1822 money seems to have become tight, as part of the land was sold off to the Duke of Devonshire for £800.

      The young Wainewright had a lonely if privileged upbringing, with a firm grounding in the arts; his grandfather’s dinner table and library had seen to that. Though he was to dismiss this in one of his essays years later:

      As a boy I was placed frequently in literary society; a giddy, flighty disposition prevented me from receiving thence any advantage.

      This

Скачать книгу