Re-Imagining and Re-Placing New York and Istanbul. Hatice Bay
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Re-Imagining and Re-Placing New York and Istanbul - Hatice Bay страница 1
Hatice Bay
Re-Imagining and Re-Placing New
York and Istanbul
Exploring the Heterotopic and Third Spaces in Paul
Auster’s and Orhan Pamuk’s City Novels
Bibliographic Information published by the
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche
Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available online at
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the
Library of Congress.
Cover illustration: Claudia Quintana Fernandez/pixabay.com
ISBN 978-3-631-79832-4 (Print)
E-ISBN 978-3-631-81611-0 (E-PDF)
E-ISBN 978-3-631-81612-7 (EPUB)
E-ISBN 978-3-631-81613-4 (MOBI)
DOI 10.3726/b16701
© Peter Lang GmbH
Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften
Berlin 2020
All rights reserved.
Peter Lang – Berlin ∙ Bern ∙ Bruxelles ∙ New York ∙ Oxford ∙ Warszawa ∙ Wien
All parts of this publication are protected by copyright. Any
utilisation outside the strict limits of the copyright law, without
the permission of the publisher, is forbidden and liable to
prosecution. This applies in particular to reproductions,
translations, microfilming, and storage and processing in
electronic retrieval systems.
This publication has been peer reviewed.
About the author
Hatice Bay studied English Literature at METU (Turkey) and graduated with a PhD in American Literature from the University of Hamburg. Her research interests include city literature, literature of immigration and diaspora.
About the book
The author re-examines the urban novels of Auster and Pamuk in the light of Foucault’s heterotopia and Bhabha’s the Third Space, respectively. Furthermore, for the discussions of the nature of the relationship between the self and the other, this present study deploys Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics. This book argues that examining the urban spaces and characters of Auster and Pamuk through the prisms of Foucault, Bhabha and Levinas establishes a new critical framework that gives a constructive and ethical angle to the negative late twentieth-century and early twenty-first century discourses on the city and its inhabitants. The reader of this book will discover urban subjects who actively transform their respective cities into either heterotopic or Third Spaces and thereby become response-able for and attentive to their immediate surroundings, to their national or personal histories and, most importantly, to other people. At the same time, by bringing these two different cities, cultures and authors that are poles apart together, this book aims to problematize commonly held beliefs about Americanness and Turkishness and thus pave the way for looking at discourses such as “clash of civilizations”, “margin” (Istanbul) and “center” (New York), the belated and the advanced from a critical point of view suggesting that there is a common discursive affinity with similar outlooks on life, personal, historical and physical spaces on both sides, rather than a “clash of civilizations”. The arguments presented here will be of interest to students and scholars of city literature, comparative literature and history of ideas as well as to readers who have an interest in theory and close reading.
This eBook can be cited
This edition of the eBook can be cited. To enable this we have marked the start and end of a page. In cases where a word straddles a page break, the marker is placed inside the word at exactly the same position as in the physical book. This means that occasionally a word might be bifurcated by this marker.
To my parents Ingelore and Cemil Bay
Abstract
This study is a comparative study of Paul Auster’s and Orhan Pamuk’s urban novels and characters. It is interested in exploring and examining the ways the urban protagonists of Auster’s New York and Pamuk’s Istanbul novels experience their respective cities dynamically and constitute their identities around them constructively and ethically. For this purpose Auster’s and Pamuk’s city novels will be analyzed within the frameworks of Michel Foucault's “heterotopia” and Homi Bhabha's “the Third Space,” respectively. Furthermore, for the discussion of the nature of the self and the other as well as their relationship, Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics will be deployed. It is argued that examining the city novels and characters of Auster and Pamuk through the prisms of Foucault, Bhabha and Levinas establishes a new critical framework that gives a constructive and optimistic angle to the negative late twentieth century and the early twenty-first century discourses on the city and its inhabitants. Therefore, I argue that Auster’s and Pamuk’s urban subjects re-imagine the ways in which the city can be transformed into heterotopic, and Third Spaces and inhabitants may become response-able for and attentive to their immediate surroundings, to their national or personal histories and, most importantly, to other people. At the same time, by bringing these two different cities, cultures and authors together, I aim to problematize geographical enclosures and complicate such spatial categories and ideologies as “East,” “West,” center, periphery, belated and advanced.
Acknowledgments
I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the people who have been instrumental in the completion of this project.
First of all, I want to thank my parents Ingelore and Cemil Bay and my brother Hamza.
I am also thankful to my extended family Sultan Abla, Hande, Canberk and Yigit.
I would also like to thank my colleagues at Edeka Tamme Airport Plaza: Herr Vendel, Oliver Engel, Mohammed Zeeshan, Gökben Firat, A.Alp Aslan, Hendrik Bruns, Marco Cleve, Katie, Alona, Kristina, Herr Juttner, Lisa and others especially a special thanks goes to Oliver Engel for his kindness and helpfulness.
I extend my thanks to my adviser Prof. Dr. Susanne Rohr for her patience and comments and committee members, Prof. Dr. Jan D. Kucharzewski and Prof. Dr. Ute Berns, who agreed to read my thesis and offered their precious comments. I also want to thank my friends Neslihan Şentürk, Zeynep Harputlu, Shiyu