even the most scrutinizing researcher’s data collection efforts.
21 That is, one partner who has chlamydia and one who does not. In other words, your interest is in data on the population of potentially transmitting interactions.
While this particular example is extreme, it reflects a common occurrence in social network data collection efforts. There often arises conceptual slippage between the level at which researchers desire to gather data and the level that is accessible to them. That is, research must regularly rely on relational proxies—often that move “up” in the level of generalization (i.e., from flows toward social relations). We may only be able to measure social relationships that include sexual contact, not each sexual act, when studying a chlamydia outbreak. Tie directionality can similarly require measurement proxies. For example, researchers may have access to only one member of a reported relationship, and if that person reports having provided support to their partner, we must take them at their word that the other partner received that support (but see Barrera, 1986). While careful qualifications within analytic interpretations can potentially acknowledge the limitations of such proxies, researchers have increasingly acknowledged that such slippages have implications beyond the measurement level and have argued for thinking about different types of ties as having different theoretical—as well as methodological—implications that researchers must consider (Kitts, 2014).
Outline of the Book
From here, the book builds from the above notions of why we might want network data to provide a set of considerations that must be pieced together when developing strategies to gather it. Chapter 2 elaborates the primary strategies for sampling and measuring social networks and describes how these combine into what is known as the boundary specification problem. In Chapter 3, I describe a number of available platforms for implementing social network data collection, with a focus on how these differentially prioritize some of the elements laid out in Chapter 2. Chapter 4 describes several ethical considerations that are unique to the nature of social networks research. Finally, Chapter 5 addresses data quality in social networks research by demonstrating how it is typically assessed, some common patterns of especially high/poor-quality data, and a few strategies for improving the quality and coverage of social network data. This will be followed by a few brief pointers to areas of opportunity for future development in social network data collection.
For the next two chapters, I will assume that researchers can match the conceptual aims to the methodological strategies of their studies. I will revisit some strategies for coping with these potential limitations in Chapter 5. Given the relational questions that can arise from the perspectives outlined above, the next chapter turns to how scholars can go about obtaining data to address these types of relational questions.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
