Public Radio. She has been a featured speaker for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics national conference as well as numerous other conferences in the United States and abroad.
Nanci received her PhD in curriculum and instruction, mathematics education, from Arizona State University. She is a National Board–certified teacher in Adolescence and Young Adulthood/Mathematics. Her passions are her family, especially her grandchildren, travel, and knitting. To learn more about Nanci’s work, follow @DocNanci on Twitter.
To book Sarah Schuhl, Timothy D. Kanold, Jennifer Deinhart, Nathan D. Lang-Raad, Matthew R. Larson, or Nanci N. Smith for professional development, contact [email protected].
Introduction
By Timothy D. Kanold
At the heart of our work as teachers of mathematics for grades preK–2 is developing student self-efficacy. Student self-efficacy references students’ belief in their capability to learn the mathematics you need students to know by the end of each grade and as they prepare for upper elementary standards.
But what exactly does a preK–2 mathematics student need to know by the end of each unit of study throughout the school year? And, more important, how does a preK–2 teacher develop his or her personal self-efficacy to adequately plan for and then deliver those mathematics units of study to students?
I have been trying to answer this question throughout my entire professional life.
In 1987, I coauthored my first mathematics textbook (a geometry book for students who found mathematics a difficult subject); it was my first real experience in taking a wide body of content for the complete school year and breaking the standards down into reasonable chunks for every teacher and student to learn.
As I eventually expanded my textbook writing to include K–12 mathematics students and teachers, I realized these manageable chunks of content could vary in time length from twenty to thirty-five days, and these periods often had names like units or chapters or modules. I also realized just how hard it is to address a set amount of content in a specific, set time period in the early elementary grades, where the wide range of student readiness to learn mathematics provides a remarkable challenge and a need for standards to be spiraled within the curriculum throughout the early grades (meaning students work on some standards throughout the year or for longer periods of time–often to a benchmark or using daily routines).
As you know, mathematics is a vertically connected curriculum, and units of study at each grade level cannot be taught in random order; the units must exist in the right place and the right time in the mathematics story arc for each grade level, each year. There is an order to the flow of your preK–2 mathematics content story. And as preK–2 teachers, your understanding of the how and why of the content trajectories across these grades builds the foundations critical for future mathematics success in later grades.
During the work our team of mathematics authors and teachers do across the United States, we have observed elementary school mathematics programs in which focused unit planning provides your best chance of success. This book is designed to help you with the planning process for each unit of study and provide a model framework for you to use each day.
Sarah Schuhl, lead author of the unit-planning books in the Every Student Can Learn Mathematics series, and I realize every preK–2 mathematics teacher and teacher team needs to work collectively with their textbooks and other resources to own the planning process for each unit of study.
Developing collective teacher efficacy is at the heart of the Professional Learning Community (PLC) at Work® process. Sabina Rak Neugebauer, Megan Hopkins, and James P. Spillane (2019) highlight the importance of a collective approach anchored in content with the words, “Social interactions firmly anchored in instructional practice can move teachers beyond contrived collegiality to a culture that can in turn influence a teacher’s sense of efficacy” (p. 13). Teachers have discussions of mathematics content they are teaching each week and then place those episodes into manageable chunks of content for their team’s discussion and work.
In 2019, when Solution Tree asked Sarah Schuhl and me to develop the Mathematics at Work™ Plan Book (Kanold & Schuhl, 2020), we jumped at the chance to provide a book that would help you organize your mathematics work and story arc for the entire school year. The weekly planners we created for the book provide helpful organizational tools and may be completely sufficient for your team. However, we also realize you might need more specific direction with the elements of planning we ask you to prepare for each unit of mathematics study.
The coauthors of this Mathematics at Work unit-planning guide for grades preK–2 (Sarah Schuhl, Jennifer Deinhart, Nathan Lang-Raad, Nanci Smith, Matt Larson, and I) serve or have served in many mathematics teaching and leading roles. One such role is to serve on our Mathematics at Work team of national thought leaders. As we travel around the United States helping elementary school teachers improve student learning in mathematics, preK–2 educators often ask us, “How do you collectively plan for a unit of study in mathematics at our grade level?”
The answer to that question is the hope and promise of this book.
The Purpose of This Book
We want to help your grade-level team learn how to work together to perform the following seven collaborative tasks for each unit of mathematics study throughout the year.
Generate Essential Learning Standards for Each Unit
Unwrap standards into daily learning targets, and write those standards in student-friendly language for essential learning standards. And then use those essential learning standards to drive feedback on common mathematics assessments, classwork, independent practice, and intervention as a collaborative team.
Create a Team Unit Calendar
Decide the number of days needed to teach each essential learning standard and the start and end dates for the unit. Determine the dates to administer any common mid-unit or end-of-unit assessments or the dates you might use to administer any ongoing assessments to individual or small groups of students. Establish each date the team will analyze data from any common mid-unit and end-of-unit assessments to plan a team response to student learning.
Identify Prior Knowledge
Determine and identify the recent prerequisite content knowledge students need to access the grade-level learning in each unit of study. Decide which mathematical activities (tasks or prompts) to use for students to connect the prior knowledge at the start of each lesson throughout the unit. Use these activities to discern student readiness and entry points into each lesson.
Determine Vocabulary and Notations
Identify the academic vocabulary students will be hearing, reading, and using during discourse throughout the unit. Identify any mathematical notations students will need to read, write, and speak during the unit.
