The History of French Revolution. Taine Hippolyte

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The History of French Revolution - Taine Hippolyte страница 56

The History of French Revolution - Taine Hippolyte

Скачать книгу

the Assembly as to private communities, feudal rights and

       trust-funds.—Abolition and expropriation all corporations.

      —Uncompensated suppression of tithes.—Confiscation of

       ecclesiastical possessions.—Effect on the Treasury and on

       expropriated services.—The civil constitution of the

       clergy.—Rights of the Church in relation to the State.

      —Certainty and effects of a conflict.—Priests considered as

       State-functionaries.—Principal stipulations of the law.

      —Obligations of the oath.—The majority of priests refuse to

       take it.—The majority of believes on their side.

      —Persecution of believers and of priests.

      But, because these ecclesiastical bodies stood in need of reform it does not follow that it was necessary to destroy them, nor, in general, that independent institutions are detrimental to a nation. Organized purposely for a public service, and possessing, nearly or remotely under the supervision of the State, the faculty of self-administration, these bodies are valuable organs and not malign tumors.

      In the first place, through their institution, a great public benefit is secured without any cost to the government—worship, scientific research, primary or higher education, help for the poor, care of the sick—all set apart and sheltered from the cuts which public financial difficulties might make necessary, and supported by the private generosity which, finding a ready receptacle at hand, gathers together, century after century, its thousands of scattered springs: as an example, note the wealth, stability, and usefulness of the English and German universities.

      In the second place, their institution furnishes an obstacle to the omnipotence of the State; their walls provide a protection against the leveling standardization of absolute monarchy or of pure democracy. A man can here freely develop himself without donning the livery of either courtier or demagogue, he can acquire wealth, consideration and authority, without being indebted to the caprices of either royal or popular favor; he can stand firm against established or prevailing opinions sheltered by associates bound by their esprit de corps. Such, at the present day (1885), is the situation of a professor at Oxford, Göttingen, and Harvard Such, under the Ancient Régime, were a bishop, a member of the French Parliaments, and even a plain attorney. What can be worse than universal bureaucracy, producing a mechanical and servile uniformity! Those who serve the public need not all be Government clerks; in countries where an aristocracy has perished, bodies of this kind are their last place of refuge.

Скачать книгу