had a little difficulty, since Einstein "proved" that the law of universal gravitation is only a special case of General relativity. Ginzburg did not overcome this minor difficulty.
The attraction of photons to the Earth was also confirmed in their experiments by “etherists” (alternative scientists who believe in the ether). In particular, the “etherist” scientist Dovzhenko made good experiments with a laser beam, which showed that photons are not only attracted to the Earth, but are also attracted differently depending on the phase of the Earth's rotation. This refuted both the law of Universal gravitation and the General Theory of Relativity. Of course, Dovzhenko never proved that there is any ether, since there is no ether or physical vacuum in nature, and any indirect experience can be explained in different ways. Dovzhenko's experiments will be analyzed in more detail after getting acquainted with the new paradigm of gravity, since they become clear only after getting acquainted with the new paradigm. Here we draw attention to the most important conclusion – an object that has no mass is attracted to the Earth.
The next difficulty of the law of universal gravitation is the indifference of cosmic objects to the so – called "parades" of planets-this is when the planets, moving along their orbits, line up in one line. In the twentieth century, scientists greatly frightened us with "parades" of planets, predicting all sorts of bad things, but in practice nothing terrible and terrible ever happened during "parades" of planets, so in the XXI century they stopped scaring us. The planets are quite indifferent and indifferent to their "parades". At the same time, according to the law of universal gravitation, “parades" of planets should lead to terrible and irreversible catastrophes. Even if during a single "parade" of planets there was a slight convergence of planets-this does not mean anything. "Parades" of planets are not such a rare phenomenon, and for many billions of years of the Solar system's existence, all the planets should have collided and fallen apart, but this did not happen, which contradicts the Law of universal gravity. On one of the physics forums, our opponents countered that any gravitational perturbations of the orbits of Planets that occur during their "parade" are quickly restored according to the rule of thumb Titius-Bode and the planets return to their stationary orbits. According to opponents, this rule "saves" law of universal gravitation. However, the rule is Titius-Bode – is a rule of thumb and doesn't explain in the slightest the mechanism by which planets return to their stationary orbits. Simple formal logic says that if objects are brought together, then in order to return to their original state, the objects must push off. Therefore, to explain the mechanism of triggering the rule Titius-Bode we will have to attract anti-gravity (repulsion). Otherwise, it is impossible to explain the mechanism of operation of this rule of thumb. For the first time, we use anti-gravity to explain the interaction of space objects.
The next difficulty of the law of universal gravitation is the presence of so-called gravitational anomalies on Earth, which cannot be explained in any way by the law of universal gravitation and the General theory of relativity. These anomalies are manifested in the fact that on a certain area suddenly there are sources of increased gravity, which are attracted to plumb lines and other bodies. Sometimes these sources of increased gravity are located above the dominant position of the heights of a certain area, for example in the mountains, then the water begins to flow up, the bicycles also go uphill themselves, you do not need to pedal. On the Internet, there is an extensive literature on gravitational anomalies. However, what it is and why – no scientist even offered a theory. Gravitational anomalies are widely represented around The Globe, gravitating to mountainous terrain. Foreign scientists sometimes study these sources of increased gravity, but on their own initiative, they do not give grants for the study of gravitational anomalies. Russian scientists do not seem to know about these anomalies at all, they are not interested in them. You can, of course, "hide your head in the sand" and pretend that no gravitational anomalies exist, although the Russian Academy of Sciences has an Institute of geography, which should at least identify these anomalies and monitor their appearance and disappearance. Gravity anomalies are dangerous for humans. We will explain the occurrence of these anomalies after explaining the new paradigm of gravity. Here we note that the source of gravity is not substance, but something else that can appear above the prevailing heights.
The next difficulty of the law of global gravity is the undulation of the orbits of planets and satellites, which the law of global gravity and the General theory of relativity cannot explain in any way. This undulation of the orbits is crucial. Kepler smoothed out T. Brahe's data on the positions of the Earth, and if Newton had coordinates of real points of the Earth, he would have seen a strange, wavy line, and would not have found his law. The undulating orbits of planets and satellites can only be explained by the fact that a larger gravitational body attracts or repels a smaller gravitational body. That is, we are already drawing the reader's attention to anti-gravity for the second time, as in the case of explaining the implementation mechanism of the ruleTitius-Bode.
3. Brief information about the structure of the substance
Due to the fact that the physics of a highly developed civilization is a whole science, and not, like us, earthlings, cut into separate pieces that are not connected with each other, it is necessary to say a few words about the structure of substance and correct mistakes. We noted above that our terrestrial science surprisingly coincides with the information of a highly developed civilization in terms of the structure of substance. Scientists have correctly established that matter consists of atoms, which, in turn, consist of its stable isolated elementary particles: protons, neutrons and electrons. Protons and neutrons are closer to the center of the atom, and electrons are far away from them-at the outer boundary of the atom. Such a correct description of the internal structure of matter is a major achievement of terrestrial science. This achievement is due to scientists adhering to the classical methodology of scientific research, such as Faraday, Soddy, Rutherford and others.
However, scientists have an unfortunate error in the structure of substance. So it is believed that protons and neutrons are concentrated inthe center of the atom in the so-called "nucleon nucleus". To prevent the nucleon nucleus from being torn apart by static electricity of the same charges and for its stability, hypothetical intranuclear exchange interactions with a total number of up to four are introduced, the most important of which is the "strong interaction". According to a highly developed civilization, the nucleus of an atom is a separate elementary particle, around which protons and neutrons revolve in low orbits (very close to the nucleus), and electrons – in high orbits (very far from the nucleus), so no intra-nuclear exchange interactions do not exist in nature. In 2018, we made a physical discovery about the atomic nucleus as a separate elementary particle, which was published in the scientific reference international journal "Science through the prism of time" [1]. The discovery was made, of course, without any reference to the information of a highly developed civilization.
The second mistake, or rather incompleteness in the description of the atom, is that scientists at accelerators have discovered a large number of elementary particles, but still have not established the smallest particle of the atom, which is no longer divided. The role of such an indivisible particle in quantum mechanics is played by the electron. This, of course, is incorrect and illogical. If an electron is a quantum of matter, then, what is a neutrino? According to the information of a highly developed civilization, substance (elementary particles) consists of a specially structured community of the smallest corpuscles of two matters. Corpuscles of both materials have sub elementarily partial dimensions, are eternal, indivisible, indestructible, and have radically different properties. So, corpuscles of negative (dark) matters have the property of repelling each other, and each single corpuscle has the property of inertia, which means that it obeys Newton's second law. This, by the way, once again confirms that there are no tidal forces in nature, fictional E. Rocha and therefore there is no limit Rocha. Since each negative (dark) matter corpuscle has inertia, then the negative dark matter corpuscle itself is a quantum (the smallest portion) of mass, and the inertia forces arise, of course, not in the center of mass of the body, but in each smallest negative matter corpuscle, which are part of elementary particles. Thus, a single corpuscle of negative (dark) matter is a quantum (the smallest portion) of mass. Corpuscles of positive (light) matter do not have the property of repelling, but, on the contrary, form stable structures,
