Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence. Durham: Duke University Press.133 Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(3): 207–230.
134 Lewis, L.Y. and Landry, C.E. (2017). River restoration and hedonic property value analyses: guidance for effective benefit transfer. Water Resources and Economics 17: 20–31.
135 Light, A. and Higgs, E.S. (1996). The politics of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 18(3): 227–247.
136 Logar, I., Brouwer, R., and Paillex, A. (2019). Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs? A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 232: 1075–1085.
137 Loomis, J. (1996). Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: results of a contingent valuation survey. Water Resources Research 32(2): 441–447.
138 Loomis, J. (2002). Quantifying recreation use values from removing dams and restoring free‐flowing rivers: a contingent behavior travel cost demand model for the Lower Snake River. Water Resources Research 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000136.
139 Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., et al. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33(1): 103–117.
140 Mansourian, S. (2017). Governance and restoration. In: Routledge Handbook of Ecological and Environmental Restoration (eds S. Allison and S. Murphy), 401–413. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
141 Martin, D.M. (2017). Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty‐first century. Restoration Ecology 25(5): 668–673.
142 McCormick, A., Fisher, K., and Brierley, G. (2015). Quantitative assessment of the relationships among ecological, morphological and aesthetic values in a river rehabilitation initiative. Journal of Environmental Management 153: 60–67.
143 McIver, J. and Starr, L. (2001). Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 153(1–3): 15–28.
144 MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well‐being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
145 Mingers, J. and Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research 246(1): 1–19.
146 Mitsch, W.J. (2012). What is ecological engineering? Ecological Engineering 45: 5–12.
147 Morandi, B., Kail, J., Toedter, A., et al. (2017). Diverse approaches to implement and monitor river restoration: a comparative perspective in France and Germany. Environmental Management 60(5): 931–946.
148 Moscovici, S. (2001). Social Representations: Essays in Social Psychology. New York: NYU Press.
149 Nakamura K., Tockner, K., and Amano, K. (2006). River and wetland restoration: lessons from Japan. Bioscience 56(5): 419–429.
150 Nassauer, J.I. (1992). The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 6(4): 239–250.
151 Netusil, N.R., Jarrad, M., and Moeltner, K. (2019). Research note: the effect of stream restoration project attributes on property sale prices. Landscape and Urban Planning 185: 158–162.
152 Normile, D. (2010). Restoration or devastation? Science 327(5973): 1568–1570.
153 NRC (National Research Council) (1992). Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
154 OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2015). Frascati Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development: The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012‐en.
155 Ormerod, S.J. (2004). A golden age of river restoration science? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14(6): 543–549.
156 Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2006). The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11(1): 10.
157 Palmer, M.A. and Allan, J.D. (2006). Restoring rivers. Issues in Science and Technology 22(2): 40–48.
158 Palmer, M.A. and Bernhardt, E.S. (2006). Hydroecology and river restoration: ripe for research and synthesis. Water Resources Research 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004354.
159 Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Allan, J.D., et al. (2005). Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208–217.
160 Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Chornesky, E., et al. (2004). Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304: 1251–1252.
161 Palmer, M.A., Hondula, K.L., and Koch, B.J. (2014). Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45: 247–269.
162 Palmer, M.A., Menninger, H.L., and Bernhardt, E.S. (2010). River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222.
163 Perni, Á., Martínez‐Paz, J., and Martínez‐Carrasco, F. (2012). Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water and Environment Journal 26(2): 274–284.
164 Piégay, H., Gregory, K.J., Bondarev, V., et al. (2005). Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in rivers for restoration purposes. Environmental Management 36(5): 665–674.
165 Polizzi, C., Simonetto, M., Barausse, A., et al. (2015). Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 14: 158–169.
166 Purcell, A.H., Friedrich, C., and Resh, V.H. (2002). An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in northern California. Restoration Ecology 10(4): 685–694.
167 Randall, A. (1987). Total economic value as a basis for policy. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116(3): 325–335.
168 Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., and Kuby, L.H. (2004). Integrating social science into the Long‐Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2): 161–171.
169 Roni, P. and Beechie, T. (2013). Introduction to restoration: key steps for designing effective programs and projects. In: Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats (eds P. Roni and T. Beechie), 1–11. Chichester: Wiley.
170 Saarinen, T.F. and Sell, J.L. (1980). Environmental perception. Progress in Human Geography 4(4): 525–548.
171 Schläpfer, F. and Witzig, P.J. (2006). Public support for river restoration funding in relation to local river ecomorphology, population density, and mean income. Water Resources Research 42(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004940.
