competency‐based approaches to education have tried to focus more on “outputs,” rather than only on “inputs” for determining what should be taught in the curriculum. The majority of veterinary graduates today will enter private small animal, first‐opinion practice, and it has been suggested that educators focus on asking practitioners working in that environment what skills the graduate will need (Bain and Salois, 2019). It should be noted that a broad range of practices must be consulted because there are differences in equipment and personnel available from practice to practice. Surveys of practicing veterinarians engaged in performing authentic veterinary tasks in general practice have also proven critical to determining the frequency, importance, and perceived difficulty for performance of these skills (Hubbell et al., 2008; Doucet and Vrins, 2009; Smeak et al., 2012; Luby et al., 2013; Kreisler et al., 2019). Not being limited in licensure at present, veterinary graduates ultimately require a broad range of skills for commonly seen conditions and diseases of all the major domestic species, and they require different skills than a specialist working in a tertiary referral environment (May, 2015). It is critically important that information be gathered across all types of practice, and published surveys exist in the literature for skills in surgery, equine practice, bovine practice, and small animal practice (Hubbell et al., 2008; Doucet and Vrins, 2009; Smeak et al., 2012; Luby et al., 2013; Kreisler et al., 2019). These resources are very useful and essential to consult when considering what to incorporate into an educational program.
Integration of clinical skills in the curriculum requires consideration of when to present the material and whether to integrate it with other competencies. It is not enough for learners to learn the technical performance alone because without the knowledge of when to use the skill, when not to use the skill and how to modify the performance of the skill when needed, then the learner performs as a trained technician (Michels et al., 2012). The development of a veterinary professional requires that the learner has declarative or background knowledge, procedural knowledge about how to perform the skill, and can also apply diagnostic reasoning and clinical decision‐making. In effect, developing a clinical skills program means achieving a comprehensive consensus on all of these aspects and not simply generating a list of skills (Michels et al., 2012).
Initially, the emphasis of outcomes‐based education in the health professions was on the postgraduate learner, but more recently there has been a shift to incorporate undergraduate training as well (Ferguson et al., 2017). The competency‐based educational approach supports the continual documented improvement of learner performance from novice to proficient and emphasizes training in the clinical workplace (Dreyfus, 2004). Assessment is becoming increasingly focused on a programmatic approach that includes multiple direct observations of student performance that are then integrated to provide a complete picture of learner competence (Bok et al., 2018; Norcini et al., 2018; van Melle et al., 2019).
The development of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) is ushering in a new era for skills training where students are ultimately encouraged to bring individual skills and competencies together in a comprehensive authentic workplace procedural performance (ten Cate, 2005). EPAs are activities that are performed in the workplace and offer a chance for observation and assessment. Assessors have a chance to observe “in the moment” and comment on the learner's ability to perform tasks required in practice. The repetitious completion of such activities in the clinical veterinary teaching environment allows the trainee to grow and learn from the formative feedback provided to them. The AAVMC's CBVE working group recently defined nine different domains and 32 competencies in a framework, which represents consensus across a number of veterinary programs (Molgaard et al., 2018a; Molgaard et al., 2018b). The group then described eight EPAs that can be used for assessing and documenting learner development during the clinical years of the training program. Clinical skills training is now evaluated across programs through the use of OSCEs to assess introductory individual skills and short procedures in the years prior to clinical rotations, and EPAs and workplace‐based assessments that evaluate more complex procedures or activities where multiple competencies need to be performed simultaneously in the clinical environment (Petersa et al., 2017; ten Cate et al., 2018; Molgaard et al., 2018b).
Programmatic assessment has recently been validated in veterinary medicine and shows that a change in performance is not simply due to variability between raters but is due to variance in learners’ growth (Bok et al., 2018). This is important because we can now demonstrate learner change over time and predict the rate at which mastery will occur (Pusic et al., 2015). Limitations of accreditation (e.g. American Veterianry Medical Association’s Council on Education mandating the maintenance of a four‐year program) and reduced financial support (e.g. in the United States, many colleges have poor public support and rely heavily on tuition dollars) may mean that true time‐independent advancement may prove challenging for veterinary programs.
In summary, veterinarians used to talk about “see one, do one, teach one,” but today this is no longer considered a valid approach to teaching and learning skills (Michels et al., 2012). Clinical skills teaching, learning, and assessment have evolved. There is a growing body of evidence regarding learning theories, teaching and assessment principles, and learner development that can be used to the advantage of learner, teacher, and other stakeholders. An abundance of research and scholarship has changed the way that educators teach and the way programs are designed. This book is intended to focus on teaching, learning, and assessment of clinical skills in the modern veterinary curriculum and is a resource guide for students, as well as their instructors. This book is written for both veterinary and veterinary nursing students and includes chapters regarding development of skills curriculum (Chapter 2), how skills are best taught and learned (Chapter 3), and how skills are best practiced prior to assessment (Chapter 4). Also included are chapters on how learners know if they are learning what they need to (Chapter 5), how learners know they are being assessed fairly (Chapter 6), how learners can best learn in a simulated environment (Chapter 7), how to make use of peer teachers (Chapter 8), and what other skills are vital to a successful practice career (Chapter 9). The appendices include examples of OSCE assessments and recipes for simple models that instructors and learners can use and make.
References
1 Baillie, S., Crossan, A., Brewster, S., et al. 2005. Validation of a bovine rectal palpation simulator for training veterinary students. Stud Health Technol Inform, 111, 33–36.
2 Bain, B., Salois, M. 2019. Employment, starting salaries, and educational indebtedness of year‐2018 graduates of US veterinary medical colleges. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 254, 1061–1066.
3 Bok, H., Jaarsma, D., Tenuissen, P., et al. 2011. Development and validation of a competency framework for veterinarians. J Vet Med Educ, 38, 262–269.
4 Bok, H., de Jong, L., O’Neill, T., et al. 2018. Validity evidence for programmatic assessment in competency‐based education. Perspect Med Educ, 7, 362–372.
5 Cake, M., Bell, M., Williams, J., et al. 2016. Which professional (non‐technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME guide no. 38. Med Teach, 38, 550–563.
6 Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., Steinert, Y. 2016. Amending Millers’ pyramid to include professional identity formation. Acad Med, 91, 180–185.
7 Dilly, M., Read, E., Baillie, S. 2017. A survey of established veterinary clinical skills laboratories from Europe and North America: Present practices
