The New Gender Paradox. Judith Lorber
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу The New Gender Paradox - Judith Lorber страница 3
104 95
105 96
106 97
107 98
108 99
109 100
110 101
111 102
112 103
113 104
114 105
115 106
116 107
117 108
118 109
119 110
120 111
121 112
122 113
123 114
124 115
The New Gender Paradox
Fragmentation and Persistence of the Binary
Judith Lorber
polity
Copyright Page
Copyright © Judith Lorber 2022
The right of Judith Lorber to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
First published in 2022 by Polity Press
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
101 Station Landing
Suite 300
Medford, MA 02155, USA
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-4435-6
ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-4436-3(pb)
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021938629
by Fakenham Prepress Solutions, Fakenham, Norfolk NR21 8NL
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com
Acknowledgments
I want to thank Jonathan Skerrett, Polity editor, for suggesting this book. I’d also like to thank Susan Farrell, Kathleen Gerson, and Patricia Yancey Martin for their reviews at various stages and the anonymous reviewers of the first draft for their astute comments. Much of the book was written during the various levels of the COVID-19 lockdowns. That should have given me the gift of time, but anxiety over the pandemic often ate away at my ability to concentrate and write. I thank friends and East End Temple Sisterhood members for their psychological support.
The inspiration for the book came from J. Lorber (2018), “Paradoxes of Gender Redux: Multiple Genders and the Persistence of the Binary,” in J. W. Messerschmidt, P. Y. Martin, M. A. Messner, and R. Connell (eds), Gender Reckonings: New Social Theory and Research, New York: New York University Press.
Some material in the book is adapted from J. Lorber (2005), Breaking the Bowls: Degendering and Feminist Change, New York: W. W. Norton, and these articles and reviews: “Using Gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement,” Feminist Theory 1 (2000): 101–18; “Constructing Gender: The Dancer and the Dance,” in J. A. Holstein and J. F. Gubrium (eds), Handbook of Constructionist Research, New York: Guilford Publications, (2008); “Review Essay: Gendered and Sexed Brains,”’ Contemporary Sociology 40 (2011): 405–9; “Review Essay: Why Do Bathrooms Matter?,” Contemporary Sociology 41 (2012): 598–602.
New York
March 31, 2021
Introduction
Recently, I received an email urging everyone to use gender-neutral pronouns – they, their, them. A longtime proponent of doing away with gender, I nonetheless found myself resisting the erasure of my identity as a woman, even at the cost of maintaining the gender binary that I believed was the source of women’s oppression. So I refused. I want to be identified as a woman – she, hers, her. I want women to be visible. Others responded similarly to the email and to an article in Scientific American (Saguy and Williams 2019a), especially women of color. They noted the need for visibility and recognition of accomplishments as well as identifying continued areas of discrimination (Hanna et al. 2019). At that point, I realized that one of the reasons for the persistence of the gender binary is the necessity of the continued valorization of women, especially those of denigrated groups.
Today, in western countries, we are seeing both the fragmentation of the gender binary (the division of the social world into two and only two genders) and its persistence. Multiple genders, gender-neutral pronouns and bathrooms, X designations on official documents and other manifestations of degendering are increasingly prevalent, and yet the two-gender structure of most social worlds persists.
The main gender paradox I explored over twenty-five years ago in Paradoxes of Gender (Lorber 1994) focused on the rhetoric of gender equality made meaningless by a total system that rendered women unequal and exploited. Today’s new gender paradox is a rhetoric of gender multiplicity undermined by a continuing bi-gendered social structure that supports continued gender inequality. Underneath the seeming erasure of a rigid gender binary and its discriminatory norms lurks the persistence of men’s power and patriarchal privilege.
When the concept of gender