Politics of Disinformation. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Politics of Disinformation - Группа авторов страница 8

Politics of Disinformation - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

was chosen as word of the year (Wang 2016) due to the notoriety it had achieved during the Brexit referendum and the US presidential election (Jankowski 2018), which resulted in the appearance of numerous publications from 2017 onwards (Table 1.1). Although mentions in the academic record dating back four decades have been localized, these studies were carried out sporadically. Proof of this is that up until 2012 one or two articles at the most appeared each year, which contrasts with the 179 new publications registered in 2019 alone, accounting for one third of the sample. The COVID-19 crisis has significantly influenced the level of production, continuously accelerating the various phases involved in publication, which is why it is foreseeable that at the end of 2020 the number of articles and publications registered will be higher than that achieved the previous year.

Year Matches % Year Matches % Year Matches %
2020a 151 28.2 2011 4 0.6 2002 2 0.4
2019 179 33.4 2010 4 0.7 2000 2 0.4
2018 97 18.1 2009 1 0.2 1999 1 0.2
2017 30 5.6 2008 2 0.4 1998 1 0.2
2016 13 2.4 2007 1 0.2 1997 1 0.2
2015 16 3.0 2006 2 0.4 1996 1 0.2
2014 9 1.7 2005 3 0.6 1992 1 0.2
2013 9 1.7 2005 3 0.6 1992 1 0.2
2013 9 1.7 2005 3 0.6 1992 1 0.2
2012 3 0.6 2003 1 0.2 1980 1 0.2
aFrom January to August 2020.

      In this context there is a predominance of articles with multiple authorship (70%), a decision that is probably justified by the complexity of the phenomenon and a multidisciplinary approach. This analysis makes it possible to compile the list of the most productive and reputed authors in this line of research, led by three women, Emily Vraga (13 articles), Leticia Bode (8), and Michelle Amazeen (7), followed by Lucas Graves, Michael Hameleers, Edson C. Tandoc Jr. (6), H. Lee, Richard Ling, and Chris Wells (5). In terms of affiliation, 14 universities account for a quarter of the entire production analyzed, with North American institutions occupying a dominant position. Outstanding in this respect is the University of Wisconsin, where the greatest number of articles registered in WoS (22) are generated, followed by the universities of Boston (15), Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education, London (12), George Mason, Minnesota,

Скачать книгу