Semantic Web for Effective Healthcare Systems. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Semantic Web for Effective Healthcare Systems - Группа авторов страница 18

Semantic Web for Effective Healthcare Systems - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

involved in the CFSLDA feature selection process improve the accuracy of model. Having the right of features in hand, the contextual feature-based sentiment analysis and predictive analytics are possible with the dataset using supervised machine learning techniques.

Schematic illustration of hierarchy of MCDM problem. Schematic illustration of ranking of features by VIKOR method.

      This work can be improved with complete automation in building the domain Ontology, and exploring various methods for visualizing the results, which enables the users to get more information. In this study, individuals, siblings, and concepts are the only items considered for Ontology learning. It can be further extended and modeled as “sentiment domain dictionary” with the set of positive and negative words.

      However, the work can be extended to map relationship between concepts, in addition to the existing terms. It can be done by the development of multi-agent system for integration of different domain Ontology using their properties. This in turn helps to develop expert systems solution or decision support system for any decision-making problem.

      1. Somprasertsri, G. and Lalitrojwong, P., Mining feature-opinion in online customer reviews for opinion summarization. J. Universal Comput. Sci., 16, 6, 938–955, 2010.

      2. Yang, J.Y., Kim, H.J., Lee, S.G., Feature-based product review summarization utilizing user score. J. Inf. Sci. Eng., 26, 6, 1973–1990, 2010.

      3. Jacobsen, J.S. and Munar, A.M., Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43, 46–54, 2014.

      4. Olga, L.P. and Raj, R., Evolution of social media and consumer behaviour changes in tourism destination promotion. Int. J. Bus. Globalisation, 12, 3, 358–368, 2014.

      5. Varanasi, P. and Tanniru, M., Seeking intelligence from Patient experience using text mining: analysis of emergency data. Inf. Syst. Manage., 32, 3, 220– 228, 2015.

      6. Ittoo, A., Nguyen, L.M., Bosch, A., Text analytics in industry: Challenges, desiderata and trends. Comput. Ind., 78, 96–107, 2016.

      7. Nedellec, C. and Nazarenko, A., Ontology and information extraction: A necessary symbiosis, in: Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, P. Buitelaar, P. Cimiano, B. Magnini (Eds.), pp. 3–14, IOS Press Publications, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005.

      8. Maedche, A., Pekar, V., Staab, S., Ontology learning part one—on discovering taxonomic relations from the web, N. Zhong (Ed.), pp. 301–320, Web Intelligence, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.

      10. Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., Data, information, and knowledge in visualization. J. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl., 29, 1, 12–19, 2009.

      11. Guo, H., Zhu, H., Guo, Z., Su, Z., Product feature categorization with multilevel latent semantic association, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM ‘09, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1087–1096, 2009.

      12. Blei, D.M. and Lafferty, J.D., A coorelated topic model of science. Ann. Appl. Stat., 1, 1, 17–35, 2007.

      13. Colace, F., Santo, M.D., Greco, L., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Probabilistic approaches for sentiment analysis: Latent dirichlet allocation for ontology building and sentiment extraction, in: Studies in Computational Intelligence: Sentiment Analysis and Ontology Engineering, W. Pedrycz and S.-M. Chen (Eds.), vol. 639, pp. 75–91, Springer, Switzerland, 2016.

      14. Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Cunninham, H., Towards a semantic extraction of named entities. Recent Adv. Nat. Lang. Process., Bulgaria, Vol. 1, pp. 257– 263, 2003.

      15. Castells, P.,

Скачать книгу