The Unlucky Investor's Guide to Options Trading. Julia Spina

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Unlucky Investor's Guide to Options Trading - Julia Spina страница 12

The Unlucky Investor's Guide to Options Trading - Julia Spina

Скачать книгу

normal upper E left-bracket left-parenthesis upper X minus normal upper E left-bracket upper X right-bracket right-parenthesis left-parenthesis upper Y minus normal upper E left-bracket upper Y right-bracket right-parenthesis right-bracket"/>

      Simplified, covariance quantifies the tendency of the linear relationship between two variables:

      ● A positive covariance indicates that the high values of one signal coincide with the high values of the other and likewise for the low values of each signal.

      ● A negative covariance indicates that the high values of one signal coincide with the low values of the other and vice versa.

      ● A covariance of zero indicates that no linear trend was observed between the two variables.

      Covariance can be best understood with a graphical example. Consider the following ETFs with daily returns shown in the following figures: SPY (S&P 500), QQQ (Nasdaq 100), and GLD (Gold), TLT (20+ Year Treasury Bonds).

Schematic illustration of (a) QQQ returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is 1.25, indicating that these instruments tend to move similarly. (b) TLT returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is –0.48, indicating that they tend to move inversely of one another. (c) GLD returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is 0.02, indicating that there is not a strong linear relationship between these variables.

Figure 1.9 (a) QQQ returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is 1.25, indicating that these instruments tend to move similarly. (b) TLT returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is –0.48, indicating that they tend to move inversely of one another. (c) GLD returns versus SPY returns. The covariance between these assets is 0.02, indicating that there is not a strong linear relationship between these variables.

      Covariance measures the direction of the linear relationship between two variables, but it does not give a clear notion of the strength of that relationship. Because the covariance between two variables is specific to the scale of those variables, the covariances between two sets of pairs are not comparable. Correlation, however, is a normalized covariance that indicates the direction and strength of the linear relationship, and it is also invariant to scale. For signals upper X comma upper Y with standard deviations sigma Subscript upper X Baseline comma sigma Subscript upper Y Baseline and covariance upper C o v left-parenthesis upper X comma upper Y right-parenthesis, the correlation coefficient ρ (rho) is given by the following:

      (1.20)Correlation equals rho Subscript italic upper X upper Y Baseline equals StartFraction upper C o v left-parenthesis upper X comma upper Y right-parenthesis Over sigma Subscript upper X Baseline sigma Subscript upper Y Baseline EndFraction

The correlation coefficient ranges from –1 to 1, with 1 corresponding to a perfect positive linear relationship, –1 corresponding to a perfect negative linear relationship, and 0 corresponding to no measured linear relationship. Revisiting the example pairs shown in Figure 1.9, the strength of the linear relationship in each case can now be evaluated and compared.

      For Figure 1.9(a), QQQ returns versus SPY returns, the correlation between these assets is 0.88, indicating a strong, positive linear relationship. For Figure 1.9(b), TLT returns versus SPY returns, the correlation between these assets is –0.43, indicating a moderate, negative linear relationship. And for Figure 1.9(c), GLD returns versus SPY returns, the correlation between these assets is 0.00, indicating no measurable linear relationship between these variables. According to the correlation values for the pairs shown, the strongest linear relationship is between SPY and QQQ because the magnitude of the correlation coefficient is largest.

      The correlation coefficient plays a huge role in portfolio construction, particularly from a risk management perspective. Correlation quantifies the relationship between the directional tendencies of two assets. If portfolio assets have highly correlated returns (either positively or negatively), the portfolio is highly exposed to directional risk. To understand how correlation impacts risk, consider the additive property of variance. For two random variables upper X comma upper Y with individual variances upper V a r left-parenthesis upper X right-parenthesis comma upper V a r left-parenthesis upper Y right-parenthesis and covariance upper C o v left-parenthesis upper X comma upper Y right-parenthesis, the combined variance is given by the following:

      (1.21)upper V a r left-parenthesis upper X plus upper Y right-parenthesis equals upper V a r left-parenthesis upper X right-parenthesis plus upper V a r left-parenthesis upper Y right-parenthesis plus 2 upper C o v left-parenthesis upper X comma upper Y right-parenthesis

      When combining two assets, the overall impact on the uncertainty of the portfolio depends on the uncertainties of the individual assets as well as the covariance between them. Therefore, for every new position that occupies additional portfolio capital, the covariance will increase portfolio uncertainty (high correlation), have little effect on portfolio uncertainty (correlation near zero), or reduce portfolio uncertainty (negative correlation).

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

      1

      In liquid markets, which will be discussed in Chapter 5, American and European options are mathematically very similar.

      2

      The future value of the option should be used, but for simplicity, this approximates the future value as the current price of the option. The future value of the option premium is the current value of the option multiplied by the time‐adjusted interest rate factor.

      3

      Population calculations are used for all the moments introduced throughout this chapter.

      4

      This

Скачать книгу