Plastic and Microplastic in the Environment. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Plastic and Microplastic in the Environment - Группа авторов страница 25

Plastic and Microplastic in the Environment - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

route of exposure of MPs to humans is mainly from inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact (Prata et al. 2020). The plastics provide the food security by being less reactive and less expensive, therefore they are extensively used in the packaging of food, water, medicine, and the packaging industry in general. Studies reveal the presence of MPs in bottled mineral water (Weisser et al. 2021) and honey, among other foods. The main route of exposure to MPs are inhalation from the airborne MPs coming from the construction and demolition areas, industrial emissions, waste storage and disposal sites, such as landfill and waste reduction plants, where incineration of waste is done. These MPs are ingested along with food and water into the human body via dermal contacts, mainly by applying the cosmetics containing microbeads in them. However, fishes are a potential pathway for the entrance of MPs to human bodies (Barboza et al. 2020). The ocean is the largest producer of biomass and provides varieties of products which we use in our day‐to‐day life. There is a chance of toxicity due to xenobiotic compounds as well, which provide an important iodide source, i.e. salt. People are using cosmetics, toothpaste, and face scrubs, which have MPs of >1 μm, where the absorption of PE and PP particles in tissues can cause skin damage (Sharma & Chatterjee 2017). While our skin may provide a direct entry of MPs and other contaminants to our bodies, there are other routes which can cause direct exposure to them, such as sweat glands, open injury, and hair follicles. The microbeads present in the toothpaste are unintentionally swallowed, reach the gut, and may absorbed into the blood, which can cause chromosomal alteration, hormonal imbalance (which can lead to infertility), or cancer (Usman et al. 2020).

      Plastic polymer products are pervasive in human life; therefore, their particle exposure is inevitable for humans. Humans are highly exposed to the MPs problem as they are widely present in the air, water, and soil (Campanale et al. 2020).

      As foreign particles, MPs are resistant to the natural degradation process or defense mechanisms naturally present in one's body. They may cause particle toxicity, oxidative stress, disruption of immune function, or neurotoxicity (Prata et al. 2020).

      If MPs enter into the gut, they are not easily excreted by the body and may cause blockage of the gastrointestinal tract, which may disturb the function of the digestive system and lead to death (Wright et al. 2013). The immune system is unable to remove them, and this leads to chronic inflammation, which may cause neoplasia; a tumorous growth potentially capable of turning into a cancerous state (Prata et al. 2020). MPs, in sizes ranging from 0.2–150 μm have a high potency of translocation in humans across the cells to the lymphatic and circulatory systems, possibly through Peyer's patches of the intestine (Hussain et al. 2001). However, this process is not well known and needs further studies.

      Although human bodies are capable of excreting more than 90% of the MPs (Schwabl et al. 2019), its fate in the human body is not yet fully understood as it has associated risk of toxicity of chemicals like heavy metals (cadmium, lead, chromium etc.) (Massos & Turner 2017), hydrophobic organic pollutants (organo‐chloride, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls etc.), and additive compounds (Wright & Kelly 2017). These chemicals are highly carcinogenic and easily transported to the lymphatic system (Wright & Kelly 2017). These chemicals are hydrophobic and easily adsorbed by MPs, and even a very small dose is sufficient to adversely affect the biological metabolism of humans and animals.

      Microplastic waste is a matter of concern for researchers, if we don't find a remediation technique then the time is not far when our green planet would be wrapped in colorful plastics. This is quite evident from the oceans, where MPs have close interaction with all segments including biotic and abiotic. They enter into the organisms bodies via food and water as per their feeding habits. However, their harmful impacts on the body metabolism of organisms largely depend upon the particles size, and the biological processes governing their presence in organisms' bodies. The organisms' bodies have different development stages such as egg, larvae, adults etc., which would define their accumulation, fate, and impacts. Some creatures have a self‐defense mechanism that restricts them to feed upon these harmful MPs that others confuse with prey and consume in huge amounts. Sometimes, particles of size <5 mm can be successfully excreted out of the body, while sometimes they cause blockage of the digestive system and are fatal to organisms.

      Studies revealed the presence of MPs in sea products like common salts, which is the main source of dietary iodine to the human community, so they have potential harmful impacts on human health. Their significant presence has been seen in seafood like crustacean, mollusk, fishes, and birds, etc. Therefore, it is a matter of great concern toward food and nutrient safety and security, as human population is exposed to high concentration of these sea products.

      There is a vast knowledge gap of MP toxicity in the human body due to limited research. However, the main factors behind its toxicity are largely influenced by exposure route, chemical composition, adsorbed contaminants, and susceptibility of organisms. The research on human health is ethically restricted because of biosecurity measures in human‐sample handling. Therefore, we can conclude the information of exposure and possible toxicity by reviewing the possible impacts on other organisms. However, these plastics being smaller size, generally do not pass through the biological system.

      The author would like to thank the editors of the book for the kind invitation to write this chapter. I would also like to place on record my thanks to the Department of Environmental Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, for giving me an opportunity to work in the lab of the Department.

      1 Abdel‐Shafy, H.I. and Mansour, M.S.M. (2016). A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 25 (1): 107–123. Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011.

      2 Ambrogi, V., Carfagna, C., Cerruti, P., and Marturano, V. (2017). Additives in polymers. In: Modification of Polymer Properties, 87–108. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐323‐44353‐1.00004‐X.

Скачать книгу