Food Regulation. Neal D. Fortin

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Food Regulation - Neal D. Fortin страница 53

Food Regulation - Neal D. Fortin

Скачать книгу

target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_5e001d89-104a-5c4e-b897-f9d481d03a57">45 21 C.F.R. § 102.5(b).

      46 46 Id.

      47 47 21 CFR § 101.30.

      48 48 21 C.F.R. § 101.4(e).

      49 49 FD&C Act § 403(k) and 21 C.F.R. § 102(k)(3).

      50 50 Id.

      51 51 21 C.F.R. § 102(k)(2).

      52 52 FD&C Act § 403(k).

      53 53 21 C.F.R. § 102.22 on protein hydrolysates applies to FDA regulated foods. “The common or usual name of a protein hydrolysate shall be specific to the ingredient and shall include the identity of the food source from which the protein was derived. (a) “Hydrolyzed wheat gluten,” “hydrolyzed soy protein,” and “autolyzed yeast extract” are examples of acceptable names. “Hydrolyzed casein” is also an example of an acceptable name, whereas “hydrolyzed milk protein” is not an acceptable name for this ingredient because it is not specific to the ingredient (hydrolysates can be prepared from other milk proteins). The names “hydrolyzed vegetable protein” and “hydrolyzed protein” are not acceptable because they do not identify the food source of the protein. (b) [Reserved]” At this time, USDA regulations still allow listing protein hydrolysate as “flavoring.” For example, see 9 C.F.R. § 381.118 for the ingredients statement on poultry.

      54 54 21 CFR § 101.100(a)(3).

      55 55 21 C.F.R. § 101.100(a)(3).

      56 56 21 C.F.R §. 101.5

      57 57 Some states have specific date labeling requirements.

      58 58 9 C.F.R. § 381.126 and 9 C.F.R. § 431.2(e), respectively.

      59 59 21 C.F.R. § 113.60(c).

      60 60 S 1944, 73d Cong. (1st Sess § 6(a) 1933) from JAMES T. O'REILLY, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (2d ed. § 10‐05).

      61 61 This case predates the FD&C Act (1938), but the standard was the same under the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906.

      62 62 See Chapter 12 for more detail on cell‐cultured meat.

      63 63 National Milk Producers Federation, FDA Should Stop Imitation Products from Milking Dairy Terms, Says NMPF, https://www.nmpf.org/latest‐news/articles/fda‐should‐stop‐imitation‐products‐milking‐dairy‐terms‐says‐nmpf (last visited Nov. 8, 2018).

      64 64 Emily Atkin, The War of Soy Milk, NEW REPUB LIC (Jul. 20, 2018) https://newrepublic.com/article/150006/war‐soy‐milk (last visited Oct 8, 2020).

      65 65 21 C.F.R. § 131.110(a).

      66 66 Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980) (see Chapter 5 infra for more discussion of this case).

      67 67 Citizen Petition, Recognized the Term “Soymilk” as the Established Common of [sic] Usual Name, FDA‐1997‐P‐0016 (Feb. 28, 1997), https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FDA‐1997‐P‐0016 (last visited Oct. 8, 2020).

      68 68 FD&C Act § 403(i) [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)].

      69 69 21 C.F.R. § 101.3(b).

      70 70 Ang v. Whitewave Foods Co., No. 13‐CV‐1953, 2013 WL 6492353, at 4 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2015) (finding as a matter of law no customer could confuse soymilk or almond milk for dairy milk); Gitson v. Trader Joe's, No. 13–cv–01333–VC, 2015 WL 9121232, at 7 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2015) (finding that no reasonable consumer would believe that a product labeled Organic Soy Milk, including the explicit statement that it is “LACTOSE & DAIRY FREE,” has the same qualities as cow's milk); Painter v. Blue Diamond Growers, CV 17‐02235‐SVW‐AJW at 2, 2017 WL 4766510 (C.D. Cal. May 24, 2017) (“Almond milk” accurately describes “the basic nature of the food or its characterizing properties or ingredients.”)

      71 71 Central Hudson, supra note 66 at 1239.

      72 72 Pub. L. No 108‐282 of 2004.

      73 73 FD&C Act § 403(w)(1).

      74 74 21 U.S.C. § 343(w)(6).

      75 75 21 U.S.C. § 343(w)(7).

      76 76 21 C.F.R. § 101.91(a)(2) (grains from the genera Triticum, Secale, or Hordeum).

      77 77 21 C.F.R. § 101.91 Gluten‐free labeling of food.

      78 78 Id.

      79 

Скачать книгу