a Cs2O has an anti‐CdCl2 structure.
R. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, Vols 1 to 6, Wiley (1971).
It may be that the structure of Cs2O does not reflect any peculiar type of bonding but rather that it is the only structural arrangement which is feasible for a compound of this formula and for ions of this size. Thus, from the formula, the coordination numbers of Cs and O must be in the ratio of 1:2; since Cs+ is considerably larger than O2–, the maximum possible coordination number of O by Cs may be six, which then leads to a coordination number of three for Cs.
A related question arises with the structures of the other alkali metal oxides, in particular K2O and Rb2O. These are antifluorites with coordination numbers of four and eight for M and O, respectively. These are unusual since Rb is normally far too large to enter into tetrahedral coordination with O. However, if there is no feasible alternative structure, then perhaps Rb has no choice but to enter the tetrahedral sites. With Cs2O, tetrahedral coordination of Cs by O is probably impossible, hence its structure is anti‐CdCl2 rather than antifluorite. Thermodynamic data qualitatively support these observations; neither Cs2O nor Rb2O is very stable: instead, they oxidise readily to give peroxides, M2O2, and superoxides, MO2, which contain much larger anions. Further details of alkali oxides, including suboxides, are given in Chapter 16.
1.17.7 Perovskite
This very important structure type, of general formula ABX3 and typified by SrTiO3, has a primitive cubic unit cell, shown in Fig. 1.41 as a projection down one axis (a, b) and as an oblique projection (c, d). There are two ways of drawing the unit cell of perovskite. One, (a), contains Ti at the cube corners (coordinates 0, 0, 0), Sr at the body centre
Each O has two Ti as its nearest cationic neighbours, at 1.953 Å, and four Sr, coplanar with O at 2.76 Å. However, eight other oxygens are at the same distance, 2.76 Å, as the four Sr. It is debatable whether the O coordination number is best regarded as two (linear) or as six (a grossly squashed octahedron with two short and four long distances) or as 14 (six cations and eight oxygens). No firm recommendation is made!
Having arrived at the unit cell of SrTiO3, the atomic coordinates, coordination numbers and bond distances, we now wish to view the structure on a rather larger scale and ask the following questions. Does it have cp anions? Is it a framework structure? Answers are as follows.
Perovskite does not contain cp oxide ions as such but O and Sr, considered together, do form a ccp array with the layers parallel to the {111} planes, Fig. 1.41(c) and (e). To see this, compare the perovskite structure with Sr at the origin, (d), with that of NaCl (Fig. 1.2). The latter contains Cl (or Na, depending on the choice of origin) at the corner and face centre positions of the cell and is ccp. By comparison, perovskite contains O at the face centres and Sr at the corner. The structure of the mixed Sr, O cp layers in perovskite is such that one‐quarter of the atoms are Sr, arranged in a regular fashion, Fig. 1.41(e). It is quite common for fairly large cations, such as Sr2+ (r = 1.1 Å), to play apparently different roles in different structures, i.e. as 12‐coordinate packing ions, as in SrTiO3 perovskite, or as octahedrally coordinated cations within a cp oxide array, as in SrO (rock salt structure).
The formal relation between rock salt and perovskite also includes the Na and Ti cations as both occupy octahedral sites: in NaCl, all octahedral sites are occupied (corners and face centres), but in perovskite only one‐quarter [the corner sites in (a)] are occupied. The other octahedral sites at the face centres (c) have oxygen atoms at four corners but Sr at the other two corners and therefore, these sites are rarely occupied in perovskite-related structures.
Figure 1.41 (a–d) The perovskite structure of SrTiO3. (e) A close packed Sr, O layer. (f) A layer of corner‐sharing octahedra. (g) GdFeO3 structure. (h) Structure of tetragonal BaTiO3 projected onto the ac plane. Note, the origin of the unit cell is shifted to coincide with Ba rather than with Ti as in (b).
Adapted with permission from M. T. Weller, Inorganic Materials Chemistry, © 1994 Oxford University Press.
(i) Coupled rotation of octahedra in 2D corner‐sharing sheets. (j, k) View looking down the c axis of a0a0c– and a0a0c+ with the A‐site cations shown as spheres and the B‐site cations located at the centre of the octahedra.
Based on M. W. Lufaso and P. M. Woodward, Acta Cryst. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 57, 725 (2001).
Perovskite is also regarded as a framework structure with corner‐sharing TiO6 octahedra and with Sr in 12‐coordinate interstices. The octahedral coordination of one Ti is shown in Fig. 1.41(c) and (d); each O of this octahedron is shared with one other octahedron, such that the Ti–O–Ti arrangement is linear. Thus, octahedra link at their corners to form sheets (f), and neighbouring sheets link similarly to form a 3D framework.
Several hundred oxides and halides form the perovskite structure; a selection is given in Table 1.18. The oxides contain two cations whose combined oxidation state is six. Thus, possible combinations are +I, +V as in KNbO3, +II, +IV as in CaTiO3 and +III, +III as in LaGaO3. The 12‐coordinate A site cations are, of course, much larger than the six‐coordinate B site cations.
As well as the cubic perovskite structure, described so far, a variety of distorted, non‐cubic structures exist. These lower‐symmetry structures often form
