fairly minimal. Where the impacted tooth is vertically close to the CEJs of the adjacent teeth, the buccal approach may present a risk that interproximal bone may thereby disappear. Indeed, the greater the palatal displacement of the tooth, the greater will be the bony defect caused. Nevertheless, the buccal approach may be appropriate in cases where the teeth are marginally palatally displaced and situated higher in the maxilla. This will afford the opportunity for traction of the tooth by a more direct route to the labial archwire.
Impaction of the maxillary canine, close to the line of the dental arch, may have been caused by the mesially tipped long axis that it presents, and by the consequent direct contact of the mesial crown incline with the distal side of the root of the lateral incisor. This type of impaction is relatively simple to treat. Indeed, it should correct itself if the crown of the lateral incisor is tipped mesially, thereby closing the anterior spacing and providing room for the canine within the arch. The process will automatically cause the root apex of the incisor to move distally, coordinating the orientation of its long axis with that of the canine. If, however, the tooth maintains its stubbornness and shows no sign of erupting, then a labial surgical approach to the very mildly palatally displaced canine will often be the most suitable and, in terms of the traction, the most direct treatment.
A conservative attitude to the dental follicle
The dental sac or follicle is a fibrovascular capsule that has developed from a mesodermal condensation of cells on the outer surface of the external enamel epithelium of the enamel organ of a forming tooth. The follicle has an inner vascular plexus, through which the enamel organ is supplied with nutrients during growth and an outer vascular plexus, whose function is enlarging the bony crypt in which the tooth germ lies. This enlargement is achieved by its inherent capability to resorb the alveolar bone, notably as it begins to erupt. The follicle encompasses the entire crown of the tooth. Later, the outer surface of this sheath eventually develops into the periodontal membrane, which will connect the cementum covering of the developing root to the developing alveolar bone.
The enamel cuticle covering the crown is made up of a keratinous deposit from the ameloblasts and reduced enamel epithelium, and is contiguous with Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath. This cuticle separates the crown of the tooth from the follicle, from which the root develops and cementum forms. It is this separation that is responsible for cementum not forming on the crown of the tooth.
The resorption process of the bony crypt is accompanied by eruptive movements, which, in turn, bring the tooth follicle into close proximity to the oral mucosa. The follicular epithelium fuses with the epithelium of the oral mucosa and allows the tooth to break through an epithelium‐lined opening, with no associated bleeding. As eruption proceeds, the remainder of the follicle everts – indeed, it is turned ‘inside out’ – with the reduced enamel epithelium becoming the gingival cuff and presenting the most superficial point of attachment. When the tooth erupts in this normal manner, it is accompanied by a relatively generous band of gingival tissue, which is rounded and initially appears a little swollen. The most coronal portion of this gingival tissue is the free gingiva, which enables the attachment at its base to be direct to the cervical area of the enamel of the crown of the tooth, several millimetres coronal to the CEJ. An attachment of this nature is unusual, in the sense that the gingival band, immediately adjacent to the crown, adheres directly to the enamel through the agency of hemidesmosomes (cells that originate in the reduced enamel epithelium). Over the subsequent period of 3–4 years, this free gingival area of direct adherence to the enamel transforms into the junctional epithelium, thus providing the initial form of attachment of the gingiva to the tooth, on the cervical enamel area [45, 46].
It is the orthodontist’s main duty to try to create conditions that will replicate this natural eruption process as closely as possible. Accordingly, the practitioner will need to treat the follicle conservatively. If the follicular tissue is totally removed, a gingival attachment direct to the enamel of the crown of the tooth can no longer be expected to succeed. Indeed, the attachment that will result will be on cementum, at the root surface or somewhere below and beyond the CEJ. The unfortunate result will then be an elongated clinical crown and a compromised periodontal result (Figure 5.9).
In the case of the surgical extraction of an impacted wisdom tooth, it is essential to carefully dissect out the dental follicle. This will prevent the possible later occurrence of cysts that may form from residual follicle epithelium. It follows that, in the absence of the wisdom tooth, the residual follicle has no function, other than its potential nuisance value. This, however, is not the case when the wisdom tooth is exposed and not extracted. In this latter situation, the surrounding follicle has an important function to fulfil – a function that is identical to the function of a normally erupting tooth and is integral to the establishment of a normal biological support system. It is important to understand this essential difference between extraction and exposure of the wisdom tooth.
It has been demonstrated in regard to teeth that have been buried for a long period that pathological changes occur in the follicle surrounding the crown (see Figure 6.13). These changes will have brought the enamel surface into direct contact with the surrounding tissues [47]. It is easy to draw a parallel between this condition and the artificial environment produced by an impacted tooth, which has been surgically exposed and which, in the absence of extrusive force being applied, has subsequently become re‐buried in the tissues. If, for whatever reason, the tooth does not erupt spontaneously, a long‐term direct contact between the tissues and the enamel of the tooth will occur.
Fig. 5.9 A case treated by the author in the mid‐1970s, before the era of the acid‐etch technique. (a) A left impacted maxillary central incisor had been exposed and the entire follicular sac removed, prior to cementing a band. (b) At two years post treatment, the gingival contour is poor, the clinical crown is long and there has been positional relapse of the previously aligned tooth.
The surgeon will need to make an opening, adequate in size and one that will not eventually close over, and will therefore work to clear the tissues surrounding an impacted tooth. In doing so, in general, the surgeon will deliberately and completely remove the follicle surrounding the tooth (Figure 5.9). The oral epithelium will grow down the sides of the opening and into the area that has been surgically cleared of follicular tissue. It will grow down as far as the deepest point where instrumentation has occurred, which in this case will be at least to the CEJ or possibly a little way down the root surface. The depth of its descent will be entirely dependent on how carefully the surgery was performed. Such a depth is considerably more apical than one would expect to find in a tooth whose recent eruption has occurred spontaneously. A compromised gingival attachment will result. The subsequently erupted tooth will have a longer clinical crown and reduced alveolar crest height, in sharp contrast to a tooth that has erupted normally.
A new look must be taken at the surgical plan for the exposure of unerupted teeth. If bonding will not take place during the surgical procedure, then, in order to prevent the re‐closing of the wound, a wider exposure must be performed and a surgical pack may need to be placed. Despite the importance of avoiding over‐zealous surgical removal of the follicle and of damaging the CEJ area by the forceful placement of the pack, a poorer periodontal result is to be expected. Attachment bonding will need to be performed as soon as convenient, subsequent to the removal of the pack. However, at such a later date, the healing and swollen gingival tissue surrounding the exposed tooth will be tender and will be covered with plaque that will have accumulated since the procedure. It will also bleed with minimum provocation, since effective tooth brushing in this delicate and sensitive area is unlikely to have been possible. These are not conditions that are conducive to reliable
