Life in the Open Ocean. Joseph J. Torres

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Life in the Open Ocean - Joseph J. Torres страница 60

Life in the Open Ocean - Joseph J. Torres

Скачать книгу

velocity of prey. Together, Mill’s observations and Madin’s conceptual treatment provide a useful framework for examining the feeding strategies of medusae.

      Water Flow and Swimming

Schematic illustration of different hunting and feeding behaviors of medusae.

      Source: Adapted from Mills (1981).

      Attraction Between Predator and Prey

      High concentrations of medusae can be achieved by physical aggregating mechanisms or by rapid reproduction in place to form a true bloom (Graham et al. 2001). Physical cues that have been implicated in high concentrations of medusae include light‐mediated migrations such as diurnal vertical migration and aggregations associated with discontinuities in temperature, salinity, and density (pycnoclines) in the vertical plane. The reasons for accumulation of medusae at pycnoclines likely include higher concentrations of prey at the density discontinuities as well as passive mechanisms such as buoyancy at the cline.

      Wind, waves, and currents can also act to produce aggregations of medusae. Populations of medusae are often compressed along the shoreline, resulting in rafts of jellies on the beach during periods of onshore winds. Oceanic frontal systems may harbor increased densities of medusae relative to waters outside of the frontal zone, similar to increases in populations observed in fishes and other more mobile species at oceanic fronts. Interestingly, a unique, persistent aggregation of the medusa Chrysaora fuscescens may be found in Monterey Bay California, the result of upwelled water entrained by a coastal prominence in the northern part of the bay (Graham et al. 1992).

      Diets, Feeding Rates, and Impacts on Prey Populations

      Impacts of medusae vary considerably and depend largely on predator density. Purcell and Arai (2001) demonstrated that prey‐removal rate by the hydromedusa Aequorea victoria ranged from 0.1 to 73% of available herring larvae per day from coastal waters off Vancouver Island, British Columbia, depending upon predator concentrations. Clearly, medusan predation can have a profound influence on larval survivorship, particularly when wind and wave or reproductive activity act to concentrate weakly swimming prey and gelatinous predators in one location.

      The radial symmetry, stinging tentacles, and gelatinous character of medusae make them highly effective as predators, particularly as ambush predators. However, they also may find themselves as prey in the diets of other medusae. In particular, the semaeostome scyphomedusae often have hydromedusae in their diet when the smaller medusae are available in quantity, e.g. during early spring (Purcell 1991). At this time, no scyphozoan medusa is known to prey exclusively on other medusae, but it may be that the narcomedusae, the slow swimming hydromedusae important in the mesopelagic zone, specialize on other jellies (Purcell and Mills 1988).

      Source: Adapted from Purcell and Arai (2001).

Species Size Prey type (density) Prey eaten (no. • pred−1 • d−1) Clearance ratesa (no. • pred−1 • d−1) Prey consumed (% • d−1) References
Siphonophore
Physalia physalis na Larvaea (~0.2 m−3) 120 600 000 60 Purcell (1984)
Rhizophysa eysenhardti na Larvaea (28 m−3) 9 311 28.3 Purcell (1981a)
Medusae
Aequorea victoria 33–68 mm