Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 1985–1991.22 22 Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al. BARI 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2503–2511.
23 23 Bangalore S, Pursnani S, Kumar S, Bagos PG. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for prevention of spontaneous myocardial infarction in subjects with stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2013; 127: 769–781.
24 24 Chacko L, Howard JP, Rajkumar C, et al. Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction Stratified by Stable and Unstable Coronary Artery Disease. A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363
25 25 Windecker S, Stortecky S, Stefanini GG et al. Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta–analysis. BMJ 2014; 348:g3859.
26 26 Goy JJ, Eeckhout E, Burnand B, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet 1994; 343: 1449–1453.
27 27 Goy JJ, Kaufmann U, Hurni M, et al. SIMA Investigators 10‐year follow‐up of a prospective randomized trial comparing bare‐metal stenting with internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis the SIMA (Stenting versus Internal Mammary Artery grafting) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52(10): 815–817.
28 28 Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3): 213–224.
29 29 Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217–225.
30 30 Anonymous. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. The Lancet 1993; 341: 573–580.
31 31 Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty versus bypass‐surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1037–1043.
32 32 King SB III, Lembo, NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1044–1050.
33 33 Anonymous. First‐year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). CABRI Trial Participants. The Lancet 1995; 346: 1179–1184.
34 34 Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez‐Balino N, et al. Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in‐hospital results and 1‐year follow‐up. ERACI Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1060–1067.
35 35 Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, et al. A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one‐ to eight‐year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1293–1304.
36 36 BARI Investigators. The final 10‐year follow‐up results from the BARI randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1600–1606.
37 37 Niles NW, McGrath PD, Malenka D, et al. Survival of patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of a large regional prospective study. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1008–1015.
38 38 Gersh BJ, Frye RL. Methods of coronary revascularization: things may not be as they seem. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2235–2237.
39 39 Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary‐artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1117–1124.
40 40 Legrand VM, Serruys PW, Unger F, et al. Three‐year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation 2004; 109: 1114–1120.
41 41 Serruys PW, Ong ATL, van Herwerden LA, et al. Five‐year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 575–581.
42 42 Rodriguez AE, Baldi J, Pereira CF, et al. Five‐year follow‐up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 582–588.
43 43 Booth J, Clayton T, Pepper J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: six‐year follow‐up from the Stent or Surgery trial (SoS). Circulation 2008; 118: 381–388.
44 44 Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1190–1197.
45 45 Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary‐artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961–972.
46 46 Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients: 1‐year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 432–440.
47 47 Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes.N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 2375.
48 48 Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three‐vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5‐year follow‐up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 629–638.
49 49 Thuijs DJFM, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three‐vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10‐year follow‐up of the multicenter randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2019; 394:1325–1334.
50 50 VA Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Eighteen‐year follow‐up in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for stable angina. Circulation 1992; 86: 121–130.
51 51 Varnauskas E. Twelve‐year follow‐up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 332–337.
52 52 Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, Killip T. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1665–1671.
53 53 Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10‐year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994; 344: 563–570.
54 54
