J.L., Lord, L.K., and Buffington, C.A.T. (2011). Sickness behaviors in response to unusual external events in healthy cats and cats with feline interstitial cystitis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 238: 67–73.167 Sudo, N. et al. (2004). Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558: 263–275.
168 Summers, J.F., Diesel, G., Asher, L. et al. (2010). Inherited defects in pedigree dogs. Part 2: Disorders that are not related to breed standards. Vet. J. 183: 39–45.
169 Takeda, N., Hasegawa, S., Morita, M. et al. (1993). Pica in rats is analogous to emesis: An animal model in emesis research. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 45 (4): 817–821.
170 Tanaka, A., Wagner, D.C., Kass, P.H. et al. (2012). Associations among weight loss, stress, and upper respiratory tract infection in shelter cats. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 240: 570–576.
171 Thomas, C.W., Rising, J.L., and Moore, J.K. (1976). Blood lead concentrations of children and dogs from 83 Illinois families. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 169: 1237–1240.
172 Thrusfield, M.V., Holt, P.E., and Muirhead, R.H. (1998). Acquired urinary incontinence in bitches: Its incidence and relationship to neutering practices. J. Small Anim. Pract. 39: 559–566.
173 Vandevelde, M. and Fatzer, R. (1980). Neuronal ceroid‐lipofuscinosis in older dachshunds. Vet. Pathol. 17: 686–692.
174 Waisglass, S.E., Landsberg, G.M., Yager, J.A. et al. (2006). Underlying medical conditions in cats with presumptive psychogenic alopecia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 228: 1705–1709.
175 Weaver, A.D. (1983). Survey with follow‐up of 67 dogs with testicular Sertoli cell tumours. Vet. Rec. 113 (5): 105–107.
176 Westropp, J.L., Kass, P.H., and Buffington, C.A.T. (2006). Evaluation of the effects of stress in cats with idiopathic cystitis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 67: 731–736.
177 Wirant, S.C., McGuire, B. (2004). Urinary behavior of female domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): Influence of reproductive status, location and age. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 85: 335–348.
178 Yamamoto, K., Matsunaga, S., Matsui, M. et al. (2002). Pica in mice as a new model for the study of emesis. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24 (3): 135–138.
179 Yeates, J.W. (2012). Maximizing canine welfare in veterinary practice and research: A review. Vet. J. 192: 272–278.
180 Yeom, M., Ahn, S., Oh, J.Y. et al. (2020). Atopic dermatitis induces anxiety‐ and depressive‐like behaviors with concomitant neuronal adaptations in brain reward circuits in mice. Prog. Neuro‐Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109818.
181 Zink, M.C., Farhoody, P., Elser, S.E. et al. (2014). Evaluation of the risk and age of onset of cancer and behavioral disorders in gonadectomized Vizslas. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 244: 309–319.
182 Zulch, H.E., Mills, D.S., Lambert, R. et al. (2012). The use of tramadol in a Labrador retriever presenting with self‐mutilation of the tail. J. Vet. Behav. 7 (4): 252–258.
5 Safety Net Programs
Erin Doyle and Seana Dowling-Guyer
5.1 Introduction
Shelter relinquishment is closely linked to behavioral health in companion animals. Behavioral challenges are a major risk factor for pet relinquishment (Dolan et al. 2015; Weiss et al. 2014). In addition, relinquishment represents an inherent challenge to the behavioral well‐being of a surrendered pet, disrupting routine and security for the pet and exposing the animal to the stressors of a shelter environment (Hennessy 2013). (See Chapter 6 for more information on behavioral risks for relinquishment.) Safety net programs include any program or service that reduces risk factors for relinquishment (Weiss 2015). They include intake diversion programs administered at the time of a potential relinquishment and proactive outreach into the community. All safety net programs operate with the common goal of supporting pet ownership and strengthening the human‐animal bond. This chapter will present an overview of the impact and benefits of safety net programs, program types, and guidelines for program selection, implementation, and evaluation.
5.2 Benefits of Safety Net Programs
Safety net programs come in a variety of formats, but all have the same goal of facilitating pet retention. Their impact is the direct effect or outcome of the program—that is, increased pet retention. Benefits, on the other hand, are broader, positive effects that contribute to an improvement in the pet‐owning environment. A safety net program’s impact on the goal of reducing pet relinquishment should be a measurable effect, while a program’s benefits may extend beyond the immediate goal of keeping pets in homes to broader positive changes for the pet, owner, sheltering organization, and community.
Pets derive direct benefits from safety net programs through accessible resources necessary for their welfare, such as basic needs, veterinary care, and behavioral support. Provisioning these resources and services directly improves an animal’s health and welfare while reducing the risk of relinquishment. Keeping animals out of shelters through programs that support pet ownership also eliminates the stress of transition and inherent stressors of a shelter environment on the animal.
Pet owners also benefit from safety net programs. Programs that support pet ownership facilitate pet retention, decrease the stress related to an inability to meet the needs of the pet, and eliminate the need for a difficult relinquishment decision. Continued pet ownership may also allow owners to enjoy the benefits of improved physical and mental health (McCune et al. 2014; Wells 2019). In addition, safety net programs provide support services that can enhance the owner‐pet relationship. Informational resources can improve an owner’s understanding of the pet’s needs and enable an owner to better meet those needs (Kidd et al. 1992; New et al., 2000; Patronek et al. 1996a; Patronek et al. 1996b). Knowing more about species‐specific behavior may normalize the pet’s behavior, which can reduce an owner’s frustration.
Safety net programs also yield beneficial effects for the sheltering organization and the community at large. One obvious effect of reducing pet relinquishments is the potential to reduce shelter intakes. A reduction in shelter animal population better enables an organization to function within its capacity for care, improving the well‐being of animals and personnel within the shelter, and potentially allowing care for animals that require more resources. In addition, reduced intakes may allow an organization to scale up or down or to shift focus, including expanding their community programs to support pet ownership. Such expansion may include strategic community partnerships that allow the organization to provide more comprehensive support through coordinated and targeted services. Greater engagement with the community improves knowledge of its pet ownership needs and challenges, facilitating more tailored programs and increasing their impact. Additionally, increased engagement with the community provides the organization multiple touchpoints, engendering positive perceptions and cementing the idea that an animal sheltering organization is a supportive resource for all pet owners.
5.3 Program Types
Programs vary in scope and achieve impact through a variety of strategies. All programs should be based on a foundation of cultural awareness and lack of judgment,
