of financial opinions (for example, S&P ratings, see an example of a lawsuit against S&P in Sheffield 2015) make clear that, in the twenty-first century, communication rights serve as an expanded version of the first declarations of rights in the eighteenth century or in the First Amendment of the US Constitution. These earlier declarations aimed to defend freedoms from the Crown, just as communication rights today defend media freedom from the state.
We are witnessing a revolution similar to that brought about by the printing press, which helped end the monopoly of the monarchy and privileged classes over information. Then, as now, society is moving toward new spaces of freedom for the universal subject, for every citizen.
Within this paradigm, I would emphasize that the same communication rights apply to the dissemination of information on Twitter or a blog. Even if these sites are cost free, they deal in data traffic as a form of payment. We are also talking about the same right when a child or adolescent publishes photos on Snapchat or Instagram as we are when a reputed columnist writes a piece for the New York Times or El País.
Therefore, it is clear that the signatory states to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights cannot prohibit media, a new dissemination method, or a set of specific contents or broadcasters, no matter how bothersome they are to some. Since the 1990s, social networks and the Internet more broadly have placed information within the reach of all (or nearly all) across borders, though a digital divide still exists. Given restrictions on freedom, we should think about how to guarantee other rights that become more vulnerable in the presence of such restrictions, such as rights to dignity and privacy. A court should rule that the dissemination of a given message is illegal only if it threatens to violate a more important or more personal right.
Rights, and therefore law, need to be crossborder. Access to Facebook facilitated the Arab Spring. The Cuban blogger Yoani Sánchez18 communicated “blindly” because she was able to send out messages on Twitter but not receive any. Society will take advantage of technology to assert its communication rights, just as individuals and groups searched for alternative media and pirate radio channels to search for, receive, and impart information within the Soviet bloc between the end of World War II and the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. During the Franco era, Spaniards listened to Radio Libertad (Radio Freedom), which broadcasted from beyond the Pyrenees, in order to follow the news in a country where owning or publishing a newspaper was prohibited.
References
1 Alandete, D. (2018). La Comisión Europea renuncia a la legislación contra las noticias falsas. El Pais newspaper (3 April). https://elpais.com/internacional/2018/04/02/actualidad/1522694360_002636.html (accessed July 24, 2020).
2 Abad Alcalá, L. (2015). “El derecho a la información y las libertades informativas en el ámbito europeo”, “El derecho a la información en los textos universales.” In: Derecho de la información: el ejercicio del derecho a la información y su jurisprudencia (ed I. Bel Mallén and L. Corredoira), 69–96. Madrid: Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
3 Arellano Toledo, W. (ed.) (2012). Políticas y derecho de las telecomunicaciones en Europa, Norteamérica y México. Szeged: INFOTEC.
4 Bel Mallén, I. and Corredoira, L. (2015). El ejercicio del derecho a la información y su jurisprudencia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
5 Bienkof, A. (2018). Theresa May calls for new laws to ban the abuse of politicians on social media. Business insider (6 February). https://www.businessinsider.com/theresa-may-abuse-politicians-social-media-twitter-facebook-bullying-laws-2018-2?IR=T (accessed July 24, 2020).
6 Birdsall, W.F. (2007). Web 2.0 as a social movement. Webology 4 (2): 5–11.
7 Cetina Presuel, R. and Martínez Sierra, J. (2019). Algorithms and the news: social media platforms as news publishers and distributors. Revista De Comunicación 1(2): 261–285.
8 Cohen, J.E. (2017). Affording fundamental rights. Critical Analysis of Law 4 (1): 76–90.
9 Corredoira, L. (2006). Lectura de la Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos de 1948 en el paradigma de la nueva sociedad de la información. Estudio específico del artículo 19. In: Libertad En Internet: La Red Y Las Libertades De Expresión E Información (ed. L. Cotino), 57–74. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
10 Corredoira, L. (2007). A new reading of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) in our information societies. Journal Media & Cultural Politics 3 (3): 336–347.
11 Corredoira, L. (2015). Los medios en Internet: entre la anarquía y la hiperregulación. In: Periodismo en la red: géneros, estilos y normas (ed. L. Núñez Ladeveze), 415–440. Madrid: Editorial Universitas, S.A.
12 Corredoira, L. (2017). Cyberlaw Clinic UCM. Retuitear contenidos puede ser delito. (Spanish Supreme Court STS 3804/2017). http://infosociedad.blogspot.com.es/2017/11/retuitear-contenidos-puede-ser-delito.html (accessed July 24, 2020).
13 Corredoira, L. and Cotino, L. (2013). Libertad de expresión e información en Internet. Amenazas y protección de los derechos personales. Madridf: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
14 D’Arcy, J. (1969). Direct broadcast satellites and the human right to communicate. EBU Review 118: 14–18.
15 Danieli, Y., Stamatopoulou, E., and Dias, C.J. (eds.) (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Fifty Years and Beyond. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
16 de Sola Pool, I. (1983). Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17 Derieux, E. (2010a). Droit des médias. Droit français, européen et international. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.
18 Derieux, E. (2010b). 30 ans de droit de la communication: étapes d’une longue marche de 30 ans d’incertitude et d’inaptitude. Legicom 2010/2 (45): 139–153.
19 Desantes Guanter, J.M. (1974). La información como derecho. Madrid: Editora Nacional.
20 Desantes Guanter, J.M. (1976). La función de informar. Navarra: EUNSA. Ediciones Universidad de Navarra Pamplona.
21 Desantes Guanter, J.M., Bel Mallen, I., and Garcia Sanz, R.M. (1994). Derecho de la Información (II). Los mensajes informativos. Madrid: Colex.
22 European Commission (2017). State of the Union 2017 – Cybersecurity: Commission Scales up EU’s Response to Cyber-attacks. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/IP_17_3193 (accessed July 24, 2020).
23 ICNL (2015). The right to freedom of expression: restrictions on a foundational right. Global Trends in NGO Law 6 (1): 2.
24 International Telecommunication Union (2003). World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), Geneva, Principles Declaration. https://www.itu.int/net/wsis (accessed July 24, 2020).
25 International Telecommunication Union (2014). World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), +10 High-Level Event (Online). Outcome Documents.
