take a shot that you don't know the consequences of. Or rather, you don't know. But in the case of people, it's people against people, and in this case, it's machine against machine. It gives you instructions, which you follow. We believe that if you check the machine periodically and it's under the control of another intelligence system, it's doing everything right. What's it worth for them to collude? Or one system taking control of another… That's how all revolutions and coups started. First, the special services, which had access to everything, they could have power over everything, colluded with each other, and then presented a certain rebel, led him to the goal, then eliminated him and became the power.
Now the next one, no less fantastic than any such program. You may laugh at first, but I thought that everything that happens on Earth is not conceived by us. We're not so bad, we're not completely stupid. Realistically why would we, for one thing, spend so much money creating weapons? Why create so many things that can destroy the world several times over? Why? After all, you can produce exactly enough to be enough for one time, and do not spend more. Although that's completely idiotic. Logically, weapons of mass destruction should destroy no more than 30 percent of humanity. But that's not enough, we want to kill all people, and with a 500 percent guarantee. Don't you think that's clearly not what people want? Don't you think that someone put that in people's minds? It's not logical to create a weapon for defense that will kill you.
Although if we imagine, say, even in the developed Roman Empire, modern capabilities, such as determining gender in the womb, the ability to make medical diagnoses, launching satellites to detect natural disasters, supersonic flight, and flight in general, it would be something just as incredible. With all of this, it would be possible to change a reality that has not yet come to pass.
We will not develop this thought further. I hope you understood what the point was. Let's return to our worlds.
Let's think about it. Why should this signal find its mate in a distant world, or rather, another world? Here we have to agree that like begets like. That is, although it is still difficult for us to even understand it, signals of entangled pairs can be transformed into some kind of a code of the mind. After all, we can determine the chemical composition of a star and even planets near it by spectral analysis of the light emitted by it. Now that's not surprising. We believe that for the search of the mind in the universe it would be more logical to send us to them, by the way, as well as them to us, a signal at the frequency of radiation of hydrogen, or carbon, or other elements necessary for the origin and existence of life in general. At least as we understand it. Certain atoms are necessary for life to arise. All living things are composed mainly of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, and small amounts of heavier elements, from phosphorus and calcium to iron.
In the work "Scientific bases of the problem of existence and search for extraterrestrial civilizations", which was published in 1985, Professor Troitsky writes: "More than twenty years ago in the journal Nature J. Cocconi and F. Morrison drew attention to the fact that with the current state of radio technology is possible to establish two-way radio communication between civilizations in our Galaxy. But for this both correspondents need to know the wavelength, the direction of sending and receiving radio signals and the time of communication. The merit of the authors of the work was the assumption that for communication should be chosen wave 21 cm, because it should be known to all civilizations as the radiation of neutral interstellar hydrogen. At this wave, mankind continuously conducts radio astronomical studies of the distribution of hydrogen in the Galaxy and other galaxies, which increases the likelihood of accidental detection of radiation sent by any VC at a wavelength of 21 cm in order to draw attention to themselves and receive response signals."
After this work immediately began the search for such signals with the help of large radio telescopes that already existed by that time. The search was based on the assumption that there could be a civilization with a sufficiently large age in the technological phase, which had begun to send signals into space earlier than we did.
And now about why I consider the unrecognized mutual influence of electron pairs in different worlds to be natural. Note: not only should they naturally and mutually influence each other, but they should find these very worlds. Yes, I realize this is unbelievable and amazing. But weren't the statements about the magnetic poles of the planet and the invention of the compass amazing? It seems like a simple device, but it gave so much to our world. It could be the same in this case. We search, we guess, and everything is elementary, as the famous character Conan Doyle said.
My hypothesis is that we can't get to the wrong place. The entangled pair… that is, the second part of that pair is already there, so the path is already there. Some kind of route line. So the change signals sent from here will be reflected there. Don't you get my idea? Or you, if it's easier for you to understand your interlocutor… The system works like a flashlight and the area it illuminates. The flashlight sends out a beam and it's there in a flash. We generate these particles here, and their entangled pairs are already there. They're not wandering around somewhere. These worlds are really interconnected. Like the waters of the world's oceans, like the ecosystem of the world.
However, even if the worlds are the same – that doesn't mean there isn't a variant of reflection warp… It's all god knows where. Across the universe, stars, nebulae, and more. You know what I mean? The signal will get into the field of influence of radiation, and quasars, and black holes, and gravity of galaxies… and if the influence is mutual, then the minimum change there – and here will be not a slap, but a shot from a cannon. A kiss there and a carnival there, a quarrel there and an international scandal there. After all, let's say that the same statement can be transmitted to another person, for example, with a changed intonation, and the perception, and consequently the emotional state, will be different. Correspondingly, the action from the received signal may be different as well.
Chapter 8: A World with Opposite Indicators
And now let's look from the point of view of science, whether there is any hint of the real existence of the opposite… or, let's say, with opposite indicators… world. Turns out there is. And with great precision. Meet His Majesty the antiproton. Let's get acquainted with it, see, so to speak, who it is, where it comes from and how we should live with it.
Antiproton is an antiparticle with respect to the proton. It has a negative electric charge and negative baryonic number, other properties coincide with those of the proton. It's very important, all these coincidences. First discovered in 1955 at the proton gas pedal at the University of California, Berkeley. Antiprotons are born, with a fairly high probability, in high-energy collisions of nucleons. This is the common name for the protons and neutrons that make up the atomic nucleus. Antiprotons are observed in cosmic rays coming to Earth.
О! Doesn't that give you something to think about? You might even say, "aliens are among us." What did you think? Imagine, there are more living things inside our bodies than there are people on Earth. And now think, if we want to establish a connection with them, to what level we need to "descend" and in the way of thinking and size? Don't hurry to laugh, we have already connected with them as soon as we discovered them… and even before that, without knowing them. Since they affect us, some positively, others negatively, and we use them or "fight" them, we are in contact. At least our brain and nervous system do. That's the paradox. However, let's return to the main topic.
As for the antiproton – this is very important. If there is an antiproton, why shouldn't there be an "anti" of all elements? Now we ask ourselves: what kind of world would they then put together? Or – what kind of world are they stable in? Like all the other elements in ours? An anti-world? An opposite one? Parallel? Since all the other qualities are the same. Does that make sense? We don't know what worlds are out there. If we have found here with the help of science what was thought to be magic, i.e. substance with opposite qualities, the same antiproton, why not assume that everything is the same there, but at the same time a little different. For example, other understandings of the sensible. Like in a mirror: you see yourself – and everything seems to be normal. Or as with a thought and its illiterate translation
