of the brain.
The issue of energy conservation is a matter of strategy for its consumption. The brain is constantly involved in optimising all the processes related to the use of this energy. It is not just the processes of the brain itself, but also those that consume the remaining four-fifths of the energy. The energy of a person’s activity, reactions, actions, and behaviour. Optimisation follows a simple and reliable strategy – why reinvent the wheel every time? – it is more economical to use ready-made solutions or patterns. The main thing is that such patterns already exist or, if necessary, are created and memorised.
People never think about the many activities they perform every day. Even the simplest ones. They brush their teeth, make coffee, and drive a car. But how much time and energy do they spend learning these skills? A person has a giant library of such templates, and it is difficult to say how much energy has been spent to optimise and organise these seemingly simple but necessary actions in his or her head.
There are also actions and processes that we are merely not aware of. The founder of the so-called default mode of brain function, Markus Raichle, explains that the brain is constantly busy building an internal model of the world around it. The model created by the brain acts as a forecast and helps predict and prepare for events. While the predictions come true, the brain does not attract the person’s attention, which would be much more energy-consuming.
But if something happens that does not correspond to the forecast, the person will certainly pay attention to it. For example, if you step on the steps of an escalator that is not working, you suddenly feel something like a jolt. According to the brain’s prediction, which has been confirmed a hundred times, the escalator should work, and the brain compensates in advance for the acceleration that the body experiences when it gets on the escalator.
Any changes are an incredible expenditure of energy. The simplicity of transformations, which people are assured of in childhood, which they dream of in their youth, and which they meet when they are mature, this simplicity becomes unbearable for people. It repels them when they learn the value of this so-called simplicity.
After all, in the end, for the sake of change, you always need to get rid of something, sacrifice something and rebuild something. Or, even more critically, build from scratch. And in fact, only the brain can conceive how much energy will have to be spent on this. One form of earning energy is saving energy. Changing yourself is expensive.
People claim to be lazy and content with their status, providing various explanations and citing potential difficulties or clearly unsolvable problems. The imagined difficulties per se serve as a convenient excuse for their lack of action.
People are not willing to pay for changes, but they cannot admit it to themselves. It is not necessarily people themselves who are against change, but rather their brain’s resistance to it. The visual cortex, the area of the brain responsible for imagination and mental visualisation, consumes so much energy that a person is not even capable of imagining it. This is also one of the reasons why people are not inclined to think about or consider something unless they absolutely have to.
Depending on the willingness to spend energy on thoughts about what is happening around them and in decreasing order of this readiness, people can be divided into three groups: those who manage what is happening, those who observe what is happening, and those who are surprised by what is happening.
Hence, if you encounter someone who is constantly surprised, then they are not ready to change anything that surprises them. Patient observation demands more energy, and creation and management are the height of waste. However, it is precisely this energy waste that drives human development.
Do We Really Think?
Where the illusion begins or where it does not end. Our maps of a world that does not exist.
Watch your words, they become your actions. ― Lao Tzu
The extent to which a person is surprised by events correlates with the activity of their thought processes. The term 'thought processes’ itself appeared as an attempt to describe the activity of the human brain. Nowadays, much is known about the origins and locations of these processes compared to the last millennia, but we still do not have a complete understanding of how people think.
The act of thinking is linked to human cognitive activity. Thinking includes components such as attention and perception, forming concepts, making judgements and reaching conclusions. Individuals carry out this process using words and images. Essentially, the thinking process is akin to having a conversation with oneself. If people continue to react to the world around them without asking questions or seeking answers, there will be no end to their surprise. Their instincts, rather than their ideas, will shape their behaviour.
But we already do know something important about thinking. For example, the fact that thinking is strongly influenced by associative memory. Associative memory is a kind of personal library of what a person has seen, heard, felt, and done. Most of this library is compiled and classified without conscious human control, so we can only guess what is presented in it and in what form.
Opinions, judgements, preferences, tastes and decision-making systems are built based on this library. When a person forms an opinion about what is good or bad, right or wrong, beautiful or not, all this is determined not so much by what they see, smell, or hear, but by what is already present in the memory, how similar experiences have been labelled and rated, what images and words have been used.
Therefore, to some extent, language and its well-established encodings and patterns are to blame for the simplistic perception of the world around us and the very quality of human thinking. At the current rate of development, a person actually needs more words to formulate problems. No one expected that with the advancement of technology, thinking would not be deployed at the same rate, but on the contrary, would be limited. While people today possess significantly more knowledge compared to previous centuries, the language used to convey and elaborate on this knowledge is much poorer.
The 'mental library’ also comes with its own set of issues and peculiarities. People can explain their daily decisions and actions to themselves based on their past experiences, present conditions, and the overall context. But the problem is that they may have initially incorrectly identified these circumstances and situations stored in their 'library’. This can lead them to access the wrong shelf and end up in the wrong place, which can have serious consequences at times.
A person’s thinking can be influenced by numerous factors. One of the factors, the influence of societal goals and corresponding behaviours, was mentioned above. Adaptation to the chosen community and the fear of being excluded from it is an important aspect of a person’s sense of security. The desire to be recognised within a particular environment, whether chosen independently or by chance, shifts much of the personal responsibility to what is commonly called the circumstances, such as nationality, company, group, or family.
This negates the person’s idea that the reason why they found themselves in a certain society and in certain circumstances is in themselves. But, in the end, a person chooses where and with whom to live and unconsciously fears losing it. And they are not so much afraid of losing, as they do not want to change anything familiar.
Even though deep in their minds people are always ready to be happier in a new place, they are often held back by those 'superhuman efforts’ required to make this change. People sometimes do not even dare to think about the unknown future.
Overall, people try not to think that all possible
