situations requiring hierarchy, dominant individuals activate brain regions linked to decision-making, while subordinates activate areas that reduce anxiety through trust.
This balance allowed groups to function as cohesive units. Leadership provided stability and coordination, while submission helped prevent chaos and unnecessary conflict. As a result, groups with clearly defined roles survived and passed these behavioral patterns to their descendants.
With the transition to agricultural societies, hierarchies became more complex. Power shifted from individual leaders to institutions—rulers, religious figures, and military leaders. However, the biological foundation remained unchanged. We still seek strong, confident leaders who provide a sense of security and are willing to trust them to avoid uncertainty.
Today, these mechanisms manifest not only in politics or workplaces but also in relationships, teams, and even social media. We continue to follow those who inspire confidence and submit to those we trust. This is neither weakness nor coincidence—it is a part of our nature that has been shaped over millennia.
The evolutionary roots of submission and domination help us understand why these roles are so powerful. They show that power and submission are not about weakness or oppression but about harmony, trust, and survival. While conditions have changed, these mechanisms remain central to our behavior, helping us find balance between control and acceptance.
How These Mechanisms Aided Survival
Submission and domination are ancient mechanisms that developed throughout human evolution to ensure group survival. Though these roles may seem oppositional, they function as parts of a unified system designed to minimize risks, strengthen social bonds, and increase the likelihood of success in complex and dangerous environments. They are embedded in our biology and continue to influence behavior even in the modern world.
In primitive tribes, survival depended on the ability to work together. Submission helped avoid internal conflicts that could disrupt group unity. Members willing to follow a leader’s guidance fostered harmony and reduced aggression within the collective. Biologically, submission is linked to oxytocin, a hormone that enhances trust and a sense of belonging. A study in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2016) showed that individuals inclined toward submission in socially safe environments activate brain regions associated with emotional regulation and a sense of security. This allowed groups to focus on shared tasks like hunting or defense instead of wasting energy on internal disputes.
Domination played a critical role in organizing the group and making decisions. Leaders took responsibility for resource allocation and protection from external threats. High levels of testosterone made leaders decisive, risk-prone, and capable of quick action in extreme situations. According to a study in Nature Communications (2018), the brains of dominant individuals activate areas responsible for strategic planning and resource management, giving them an advantage in dangerous conditions.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на Литрес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
