are also built in a certain hierarchy. The charter of municipality stands at the top of the system, the acts of the representative body (local parliament) are located a step below, the acts of the head of municipality are another step below, and finally the acts of other authorities are at the lowest level.
8. Customs
A special source of law in Russia is customs. The custom "is a rule of conduct which has taken shape and is widely applied in a certain sphere of business and other activities, and which has not been stipulated by legislation, regardless of whether it has or has not been fixed in any one document," (Clause 1 of Article 5 of the Civil Code of the RF). The customs cannot contradict the norms of legislation or provisions of contracts (Clause 2 of Article 5 of the Civil Code of the RF). In Russia, customs are sources of civil law only.
9. The Judicial Practice
The legal system of the Russian Federation belongs to the Continental (Roman-German) type. One of the consequences of this system is that there are no judicial precedents in Russia: the courts are obliged to make decisions, being guided by laws and other legal acts, but not by other judicial decisions. The courts can not create new legal norms.
In practice, one should consider the following:
i) The generalization of judicial practice
The highest instance of the judicial system of Russia is the Supreme Court of the RF.[22] The Supreme Court of the RF is given the right to make explanations to inferior courts, concerning judicial practice on matters, with the basis of study and generalization (Clause 1 part 7 of Article 2 of FCL on Supreme Court of the RF). Such explanations are given in the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF,[23] and informational letters of the Supreme Court of the RF.
In the decisions of its Plenum, the Supreme Court of the RF, expresses positions on the most important issues, as well as on those problems regarding which there were serious contradictions among inferior courts (for the purposes of correcting such contradictions and making the practice uniform).
Informational letters are descriptions of concrete cases; a short narrative of the court decisions made on the given cases, and the comments of the Supreme Court of the RF concerning whether the inferior court adjudicated the case correctly or not.
It should be noted that the Decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF, and the information letters of the Supreme Court of the RF, are the result of the generalization of judicial practice, and not the revision of the decision of the inferior court.
However, while interpreting a norm in the decisions of the Plenum the Supreme Court of the RF, it sometimes gives a meaning which is absolutely different from the one resulting from the literal interpretation of the writing.
Formally, the positions stated in the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF and the information letters of the RF are not obligatory for other courts. However, in practice the situation is very different. The inferior courts strictly follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of the RF, therefore the specified acts have an obligatory character. Thus, the Supreme Court of the RF can actually change the meaning of this or that norm, and sometimes change it quite substantially.
ii) References to the court decisions on analogue cases
While preparing a position on a specific case, it is recommended to refer (whenever possible) to the court decisions on analogue cases. The judges listen to such arguments, and even in the final decision on the case, they sometimes indicate how a similar dispute was previously solved by another court. Moreover, the references should be made to the decisions of the Supreme Court of the RF, the courts of the subjects, and the arbitration courts of cessation. The court decisions, standing below, are seldom cited as an example. Practice shows that the party, whose position is supported with the court decisions on analogue cases, has a much better chance of winning the case.
Thus, while studying any aspect, one should analyze not only the federal laws and other legal acts, but also the acts of the courts on relevant issues.
Evgeny Arkhipov[24]
Chapter 2 – Business Association Forms
1. Persons Conducting Entrepreneurial Activities
1.1. Entrepreneurial Activities
The Civil Code of the Russian Federation includes the following definition of entrepreneurial activities: "independent activity, performed at one's own risk, aimed at systematically deriving a profit from the use of the property, the sale of commodities, the performance of work, or the rendering of services by the persons, registered in this capacity in conformity with the law-established procedure," (Clause 1 of Article 2 of the CC of the RF). Judicial practice clarifies the given definition. Thus, on February 24, 2004 Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation rendered decision No. 3-P on the matter of the verification of the constitutionality of separate provisions of Articles 74 and 77 of the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, regulating the consolidation order of the placed stocks of a joint stock company and redemption of fractional shares. This decision was related to the complaints of citizens and the “Cadet Establishment” company, and as per the inquiry of Oktyaberski District Court of the city of Penza, specified the following:
The right to free use of one’s abilities and property for entrepreneurial and other economic activities, not forbidden by law, serves as a basis for constitutional legal status of the participants of business companies, in particular of shareholders of joint stock companies being legal entities, as well as natural persons, including those who are not entrepreneurs, and who exercise their rights through holding stocks, certifying the rights to obligation of its owners, towards the joint stock company.
Proceeding from the aforementioned position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the activities of shareholders shall be recognized as entrepreneurial.
1.2. The Right to Engagement in Entrepreneurial Activities
Natural persons (people) and legal entities (organizations) can be engaged in entrepreneurial activities in Russia.
1.2.1. Natural Persons
Another name given to natural persons in Russian law is “citizens.” One should take into account that in civil and business legislation the word «citizens» means all "natural persons," and not only the citizens of the Russian Federation. While referring to citizens of Russia, one shall specifically indicate this, by saying "citizens of the Russian Federation." The word «people» in the civil and business legislation is not used.
Every person can be engaged in entrepreneurial activities in Russia. Such right is fixed in the Constitution of the RF under Clause 1 of Article 34.
It is important to note that there are exceptions to this rule. The primary exceptions are related to the legal capacity of citizens, e.g. the ability of citizens to acquire and exercise civil rights by their actions, to create civil duties for themselves and perform those duties. The legal capacity of citizens is defined by the CC of the RF. As a general rule, citizens gain full legal capacity at 18 years of age. Before reaching this age, citizens cannot independently exercise most transactions.
1.2.2. Legal Entities
Profit organizations[25] have the right to be engaged in entrepreneurial activities.
The Supreme Court of Arbitration of the RF, which previously headed the system of arbitration courts, became part of the Supreme Court of the RF. For details, please, see Chapter on Litigation, Arbitration and Other Means of Legal Protection.
The Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF is a part of the Supreme Court of the RF.
Lomonosov Moscow State University, PhD candidate, LL. B. 2014.
