as much as the excavation of the psyche. And within its motley ranks could be found political apathy, even chauvinism, as well as revolutionary commitment.
Nude Girl in the Shadows of a Branch
1905
Oil on board, 37 × 30 cm
Kirchner Museum, Davos
The first part of this book is structured thematically, rather than chronologically, in order to draw out some of the more common characteristics and preoccupations of the movement. The second part consists of short essays on a selection of individual Expressionists, highlighting the distinctive aspects of each artist’s work. Expressionism’s tangled roots reach far back into history, and range widely across geographical terrain. Two of its most important sources are neither modern, nor European: the art of the Middle Ages and the art of tribal or so-called “primitive” peoples.
Nude Laying on a Sofa (Isabella)
1906–1907
Charcoal on pencil, 68.5 × 89 cm
Private collection
A third has little to do with visual art at all – the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. To complicate matters further, the word “Expressionism” initially meant something different. Until about 1912, it was used generally to describe progressive art in Europe, chiefly France, that was clearly different from Impressionism, or that even appeared to be “anti-Impressionist.” So, ironically, it was first applied most often to non-German artists such as Gauguin, Cézanne, Matisse and Van Gogh. In practice, well up to the outbreak of the First World War, “Expressionism” was still a catch-all phrase for the latest modern, fauvist, futurist or cubist art.
Laying Nude (Isabella)
1906
Charcoal, 90 × 69 cm
Staatliche Museen, Kassel
The important Sonderbund exhibition staged in Cologne in 1912, for example, used the term to refer to the newest German painting together with international artists. Here though, the shift was already beginning. The exhibition organisers and most critics emphasised the affinity of the “Expressionism” of the German avant-garde with that of the Dutch Van Gogh and the guest of honour at the show, the Norwegian Edvard Munch. In so doing, they slightly played down the prior significance of French artists, such as Matisse, and steered the concept of Expressionism in a distinctly “Northern” direction. Munch himself was stunned when he saw the show.
Doris with a Ruff
1906–1908
Oil on board, 70 × 52 cm
Collection Thyssen-Bornemisza, Lugano
“There is a collection here of all the wildest paintings in Europe,” he wrote to a friend, “Cologne Cathedral is shaking to its very foundations.” More than geography though, this shift highlighted Expressionist qualities as lying not so much in innovative formal means for description of the physical world, but in the communication of a particularly sensitive, even slightly neurotic, perception of the world, which went beyond mere appearances. As in the work of Van Gogh and Munch, individual, subjective human experience was its focus. As it gathered momentum, one thing became abundantly clear; Expressionism was not a “style.”
Green House
1907
Oil on canvas, 70 × 59 cm
Museum moderner Kunst, Vienna
This helps to explain why curators, critics, dealers and the artists themselves could rarely agree on the use or meaning of the term. Nonetheless, “Expressionism” gained wide currency across the arts in Germany and Austria. It was first applied to painting, sculpture and printmaking and a little later to literature, theatre and dance. It has been argued that while Expressionism’s impact on the visual arts was most successful, its’ impact on music was the most radical, involving elements such as dissonance and atonality in the works of many composers (especially in Vienna) from Gustav Mahler to Alban Berg and Arnold Schoenberg.
Portrait of a Man, Hans Frisch
1907
Oil on canvas, 115 × 115 cm
Marion Koogler McNay Art Museum
San Antonio (Texas)
Finally, Expressionism infiltrated architecture and its effects could even be discerned in the newest modern distraction – film. Historians still disagree today on what Expressionism is. Many artists who now rank as quintessential Expressionists themselves rejected the label. Given the spirit of anti-academicism and fierce individualism that characterised so much of Expressionism, this is hardly surprising. In his autobiography, Jahre der Kämpfe (Years of Struggle), Emil Nolde wrote: “The intellectual art literati call me an Expressionist; I don’t like this restriction.”
Woman in a White Dress
1908
Oil on canvas, 113.5 × 114.5 cm
Private collection
Vast differences separate the work of some of the foremost figures. The term is so elastic it can accommodate artists as diverse as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Paul Klee, Egon Schiele and Wassily Kandinsky. Many German artists who lived long lives, such as Max Beckmann, George Grosz, Otto Dix and Oskar Kokoschka, only worked in an “Expressionist” mode – and to differing degrees – for a small number of their productive years. Others had tragically short careers, leaving us only to imagine how their work might have developed.
Two Nudes
1908
Pastel, 69 × 90 cm
Museum Ludwig, Cologne
Paula Modersohn-Becker and Richard Gerstl died before the term had even come into common use. Before 1914 was out, the painter August Macke and the poets Alfred Lichtenstein and Ernst Stadler had been killed on the battlefields. Another poet, Georg Trakl, took a cocaine overdose after breaking down under the trauma of service in a medical unit in Poland. Franz Mark died in 1916. In Vienna the young Egon Schiele did not survive the devastating influenza epidemic of 1918 and Wilhelm Lehmbruck was left so traumatised by the experience of war that he took his own life in Berlin in 1919.
Czardaz
