up the slopes, and gathering primroses, hyacinths, and violets, without being afraid of an old horse that was browsing on the grass at her feet.
“Isn’t she pretty?” said Bouvard.
“Yes, she is pretty, for a little girl.”
And the widow heaved a sigh, which seemed charged with life-long regret.
“You might have had one yourself.”
She hung down her head.
“That depended on you.”
“How?”
He gave her such a look that she grew purple, as if at the sensation of a rough caress; but, immediately fanning herself with her pocket-handkerchief:
“You have let the opportunity slip, my dear.”
“I don’t quite understand.” And without rising he drew closer to her.
She remained looking down at him for some time; then smiling, with moist eyes:
“It is your fault.”
The sheets, hanging around them, hemmed them in, like the curtains of a bed.
He leaned forward on his elbow, so that his face touched her knees.
“Why? – eh? – why?”
And as she remained silent, while he was in a condition in which words cost nothing, he tried to justify himself; accused himself of folly, of pride.
“Forgive me! Let everything be as it was before. Do you wish it?” And he caught her hand, which she allowed to remain in his.
A sudden gust of wind blew up the sheets, and they saw two peacocks, a male and a female. The female stood motionless, with her tail in the air. The male marched around her, erected his tail into a fan and bridled up, making a clucking noise.
Bouvard was clasping the hand of Madame Bordin. She very quickly loosed herself. Before them, open-mouthed and, as it were, petrified, was young Victor staring at them; a short distance away Victorine, stretched on her back, in the full light of day, was inhaling all the flowers which she had gathered.
The old horse, frightened by the peacocks, broke one of the lines with a kick, got his legs entangled in it, and, galloping through the farmyard, dragged the washed linen after him.
At Madame Bordin’s wild screams Marianne rushed up. Pére Gouy abused his horse: “Fool of a beast! Old bag of bones! Infernal thief of a horse!” – kicked him in the belly, and lashed his ears with the handle of a whip.
Bouvard was shocked at seeing the animal maltreated.
The countryman, in answer to his protest, said:
“I’ve a right to do it; he’s my own.”
This was no justification. And Pécuchet, coming on the scene, added that animals too have their rights, for they have souls like ourselves – if indeed ours have any existence.
“You are an impious man!” exclaimed Madame Bordin.
Three things excited her anger: the necessity for beginning the washing over again, the outrage on her faith, and the fear of having been seen just now in a compromising attitude.
“I thought you were more liberal,” said Bouvard.
She replied, in a magisterial manner, “I don’t like scamps.”
And Gouy laid the blame on them for having injured his horse, whose nostrils were bleeding. He growled in a smothered voice:
“Damned unlucky people! I was going to put him away when they turned up.”
The two worthies took themselves off, shrugging their shoulders.
Victor asked them why they had been vexed with Gouy.
“He abuses his strength, which is wrong.”
“Why is it wrong?”
Could it be that the children had no idea of justice? Perhaps so.
And the same evening, Pécuchet, with Bouvard sitting at his right, and facing the two pupils with some notes in his hand, began a course of lectures on morality.
“This science teaches us to exercise control over our actions.
“They have two motives – pleasure and interest, and a third, more imperious – duty.
“Duties are divided into two classes: first, duties towards ourselves, which consist in taking care of our bodies, protecting ourselves against all injury.” (They understood this perfectly.) “Secondly, duties towards others; that is to say, to be always loyal, good-natured, and even fraternal, the human race being only one single family. A thing often pleases us which is injurious to our fellows; interest is a different thing from good, for good is in itself irreducible.” (The children did not comprehend.) He put off the sanction of duties until the next occasion.
In the entire lecture, according to Bouvard, he had not defined “good.”
“Why do you wish to define it? We feel it.”
So, then, the lessons of morality would suit only moral people – and Pécuchet’s course did not go further.
They made their pupils read little tales tending to inspire them with the love of virtue. They plagued Victor to death.
In order to strike his imagination, Pécuchet suspended from the walls of his apartment representations of the lives of the good person and the bad person respectively. The first, Adolphe, embraced his mother, studied German, assisted a blind man, and was admitted into the Polytechnic School. The bad person, Eugène, began by disobeying his father, had a quarrel in a café, beat his wife, fell down dead drunk, smashed a cupboard – and a final picture represented him in jail, where a gentleman, accompanied by a young lad, pointed him out, saying, “You see, my son, the dangers of misconduct.”
But for the children, the future had no existence. In vain were their minds saturated with the maxim that “work is honourable,” and that “the rich are sometimes unhappy.” They had known workmen in no way honoured, and had recollections of the château, where life seemed good. The pangs of remorse were depicted for them with so much exaggeration that they smelled humbug, and after that became distrustful. Attempts were then made to govern their conduct by a sense of honour, the idea of public opinion, and the sentiment of glory, by holding up to their admiration great men; above all, men who made themselves useful, like Belzunce, Franklin, and Jacquard. Victor displayed no longing to resemble them.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить
