Figure 2.22, we observe that the Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced a weak non-failure swing sell signal, signifying a change in the trend. The bearish signal was not confirmed by the Dow Jones Transportation Average and this was therefore regarded as a bullish indication. There is non-confirmation of a reversal in the trend. The Dow Jones Industrial Average subsequently resumed its uptrend after penetrating its own secondary reaction peak.
Figure 2.22 Non-Confirmation of Reversal in Trend on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Courtesy of Stockcharts.com
The concept of confirmation may also be applied to closely correlated markets. In Figure 2.23, we observe that the change in trend in silver was not as yet confirmed by gold, a closely correlated market. This may be viewed as either a bearish signal for gold or a bullish signal for silver. A penetration of gold’s support would generally be a bearish sign for silver.
Figure 2.23 Non-Confirmation Between Gold and Silver.
Courtesy of Stockcharts.com
In Figure 2.24, we see an example of the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index not confirming the sell signals in the S&P500 Large Cap Index. This may be regarded as bullish for the S&P500. Although both the S&P500 and Russell 2000 have experienced deep reversals, this non-confirmation may be construed as an oversold indication on the S&P500.
Figure 2.24 Non-Confirmation of a Trend Reversal between the S&P500 Large Cap Index and Russell Small Cap Index.
Courtesy of Stockcharts.com
Volume Must Confirm the Trend
In Dow Theory, volume has to increase or expand in the direction of the existing trend, that is, volume has to confirm the trend. If volume does not expand in the direction of the existing trend, then this is seen as a sign of weakness in the trend and may potentially lead to a weakening or reversal of the existing trend. It should be noted also that volume is considered to be a secondary indicator.
Expanding in the direction of the existing trend means that:
1. In an uptrend, volume should be increasing.
2. In an uptrend, volume should be decreasing during a downside retracement.
3. In a downtrend, volume should be increasing.
4. In a downtrend, volume should be decreasing during an upside retracement.
If any of the four conditions listed above is not met, the existing trend may be potentially weaker than expected and may lead to a reversal in the existing trend. In Figure 2.25, we see volume, in area A on the chart, expanding in the direction of the existing primary bull trend in gold. Notice that on average, volume has declined during the retracement phase, as seen in area B on the chart. This is essentially a bullish indication for gold. We therefore expect more upside moves in gold over the longer term.
Figure 2.25 Volume Expanding in the Direction of the Existing Primary Bull Trend in Gold.
Courtesy of Stockcharts.com
Figure 2.26 illustrates the volume action associated with the primary bull trend between 2006 and 2010 in the GLD SPDR Gold Trust Shares. We see volume expanding in the direction of the trend in period 1, 3, 7, and 9. For periods 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 we see volume declining whenever there is a correction or retracement in the GLD ETF, which is bullish. This all fits in perfectly with the assumption that GLD was in a primary bull market between 2006 and 2010 and is an extremely bullish indication for GLD. GLD subsequently went north to over $180 per share.
Figure 2.26 Volume Expanding in the Direction of the Existing Primary Bull Trend in GLD SPDR Gold Trust Shares.
Courtesy of Stockcharts.com
Only Closing Prices Are Recognized
In Dow Theory, only closing prices are recognized. This means that regardless of how large the high and low price excursions may be on any one day, only the final closing price will be used. Furthermore, it does not matter how miniscule the amount that price closes above or below the previous day’s closing price.
2.3 CHALLENGES TO DOW THEORY
There are many criticisms of Dow Theory. Here are some of the more significant arguments against it:
1. Dow Theory is more applicable to the equity markets: Detractors of Dow Theory argue that the theory is unsuitable for application in faster moving markets or across lower timeframes. For example, a commodity trader would have to wait for months and maybe even years for a buy or sell signal based on the penetration of a previous peak or trough in the primary bull or bear trend. Hedgers would have few or no counterparties to take the other side of the trade. Furthermore, the capital risk would be astronomically high if the trader is expected to place a stop loss order based on the motion of the primary trend.
2. The primary trend is susceptible to manipulation: Monetary policy such as near-zero interest rates set by central banks over extended periods combined with colossal stimulus packages and quantitative-easing (QE) – to-infinity-type operations impact the longer-term action of the markets by creating an artificially super bullish environment where even its participants have little or no fear of anything untoward happening to the markets. Collective energy market rigging and the latest Libor scandal are further evidence that markets have and will always be susceptible to manipulation. Hence, Dow’s main reason for trading the primary trend is questionable in today’s highly impacted markets.
3. The averages are not a true reflection and barometer of the market environment: Unfortunately, in today’s markets, the majority of indices are themselves tradable and are therefore open to manipulation. For example, the VIX was meant to reflect the level of fear in the markets. It main objective is somewhat thwarted by the large amount of speculative trading impacting the VIX. Physical gold prices are also at the mercy of heavy shorting in its corresponding ETFs, like the GLD, or via its futures and options contracts. Such products never existed in Dow’s time.
4. Only closing prices are recognized: Recognizing only the closing price ignores potentially large intraday ranges that may occur during the day’s trading session. These important price rejection levels are totally disregarded. Furthermore, there seems to be some conceptual conflict between recognizing the smallest amount required to close higher or lower while at the same time discounting potentially large and significant day to day fluctuations, regarding them as merely noise.
5. The buy and sell signals based on the primary trend are safer: This may or may not be true, but detractors of Dow Theory argue that such signals usually occur late in the trend and miss a large part of it.
6. The identification of a new primary trend: Due to the difficulty in establishing whether a retracement is part of a secondary reaction or the inception of a new primary trend in the opposite direction, investments based on the belief that the retracement is merely a secondary reaction will run a higher risk of losing
