Laconic philosophical encyclopedia. LaPhiEnia (LPE). Oleg Starchen

      Humorosophy – the direction in philosophy, that analyzes two objects in the same time or same theme: Humor and Hume.

      α. An example of the study of humor: a research of the Parable about the Philosopher and the Sophy:

      Philosopher: Hello, pretty woman. What’s your name?

      Beauty: – Sophy.

      Philosopher: – Then my name is Logy. Come on, Sophy, let’s do philosophy, without you would be only philology.

      There is an equivoque, a mixture of the meanings of words, as the linguistic philosopher would say.

      β. An example of the study of Hume: a research of phrase:

      Hume is not humeng (HUMENG i.e. HUME as youNG) and he has a smart hume. (HUME i.e. HUmE’s Mind).

      This joke is based on the abbreviation.

      See also: Symmetry of philosophy and Philogyneya.

      Note. The parable about the Philosopher and Sophy was published singly 02.01.2012, Humorosophy first published 04.18.2011.

      I

      61 the IMAGINARY PHILOSOPHY

      Imaginary philosophy is like a kaleidoscope of the beauty of mind and imagination

      It is Non-Thalesic, Non-Phitagorasic, Non-Platonic, Non-Socratic philosophy. This is a remake of Lobachevsky’s “imaginary geometry”, “non-Euclidean geometry”. No wonder on the wall of Plato’s Academy was written: “not for a non-geometer Enter”. The synthesis of geometry and philosophy produced in non-Thalesic philosophy is similar to heterosis, making philosophy much stronger. This NOT-philosophy is actually a NEO-philosophy, new philosophy, neothalesic philosophy, neopythagorean philosophy, neosocratic philosophy, neoplatonic philosophy.

      Note. As Einstein said: “imagination is more important than knowledge.”

      62 the IDEAL OF PHILOSOPHY

      Thales, Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, was embodied the ideals of philosophy, therefore, the rejection of their style so setting a new ideal of philosophy – the Non-Thalesic philosophy, Non-Pythagorean philosophy, Non-Socratic philosophy, Non-Platonic philosophy, or if laconically speaking, Orgaosophy.

      63 the IDOLS OF PHILOSOPHY

      These idols – philosophy-itself-for-itself, mind-itself-for-itself, man-himself-to-himself, busted in Orgaosophy, Zeazrosophy, Philogyneya.

      Note. Nietzsche even wrote a book, “Twilight of the idols or how to philosophize with the hammer”, but it’s not considered as idols nor philosophy, nor reason, nor an abstract human, otherwise it was he, not I, would be the hammerer of the idols, composing of Orgaosophy (Non-thalesic philosophy), Zelastrosophy (Supramental philosophy), Philogyneya (Philosophy about woman). The same applies to sir Francis Bacon, which exposed the “idols of the square, the idols of race, idols of the theater, idols of the cave”, but not the idols of philosophy, not the idols of the mind, not the idols of human, i.e., not busted philosophy, mind, abstract human as idols.