The Literary Remains of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume 3. Coleridge Samuel Taylor
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу The Literary Remains of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Volume 3 - Coleridge Samuel Taylor страница 20
1
See Table Talk, p. 178, 2nd edit.
2
'Should it occur to any one that the doctrine blamed in the text, is but in accordance with that of the Church of England, in her rubric concerning spiritual communion, annexed to the Office for Communion of the Sick: he may consider, whether that rubric, explained (as if possible it must be) in consistency with the definition of a sacrament in the Catechism, can be meant for any but rare and extraordinary cases: cases as strong in regard of the Eucharist, as that of martyrdom, or the p
1
See
2
'Should it occur to any one that the doctrine blamed in the text, is but in accordance with that of the Church of England, in her rubric concerning spiritual communion, annexed to the Office for Communion of the Sick: he may consider, whether that rubric, explained (as if possible it must be) in consistency with the definition of a sacrament in the Catechism, can be meant for any but rare and extraordinary cases: cases as strong in regard of the Eucharist, as that of martyrdom, or the premature death of a well-disposed catechumen, in regard of Baptism.'
Keble's Pref. to Hooker, p. 85, n. 70. Ed.
3
According to Bishop Horne, the allusion is to the destruction of Pharaoh and his host in the Red Sea. – Ed.
4
See Horne in loc. note. – Ed.
5
The references are to Mr. Keble's edition (1836.) – Ed.
6
But see Mr. Keble's statement (Pref. xxix.), and the argument founded on discoveries and collation of MSS. since the note in the text was written. – Ed.
7
See Mr. Coleridge's work
8
See E. P. I. ii. 3. p. 252. – Ed.
9
See the
10
See the essays generally from the fourth to the ninth, both inclusively, in Vol. III 3rd edition, more especially, the fifth essay. – Ed.
11
Part. I. c. i. vv. 151 – 6. – Ed.
12
See the essay on the idea of the Prometheus of Æschylus.
13
'Every man is born an Aristotelian, or a Platonist. I do not think it possible that any one born an Aristotelian can become a Platonist; and I am sure no born Platonist can ever change into an Aristotelian. They are the two classes of men, beside which it is next to impossible to conceive a third. The one considers reason a quality, or attribute; the other considers it a power. I believe that Aristotle never could get to understand what Plato meant by an idea. … Aristotle was, and still is, the sovereign lord of the understanding; the faculty judging by the senses. He was a conceptualist, and never could raise himself into that higher state, which was natural to Plato, and has been so to others, in which the understanding is distinctly contemplated, and, as it were, looked down upon, from the throne of actual ideas, or living, inborn, essential truths.'
14
See the
15
See
16
But see the language of the Council of Trent:
Si quis dixerit justitiam acceptam non conservari
… Si quis dixerit hominis justificati
17
Rom. ii. 12. – Ed.
18
Matt. xix. 8. – Ed.
19
Folio 1628. – Ed.
20
The following letter was written on, and addressed with, the book to the Rev. Derwent Coleridge. – Ed.
21
22
i. 27. See
23
– — whence the soul
Reason receives, and reason is her being,
Discursive or intuitive.
24
The reader of the
25
See
Tuo judicio prorsus assentior. Affirmu etiam vestros magistratus juste fecisse, quod hominem blasphemum, re ordine judicata, interfecerunt.
14th Oct. 1554. – Ed.
26
'But to circle the earth,
27
That Christ had a twofold being, natural and sacramental; that the Jews destroyed and sacrificed his natural being, and that Christian priests destroy and sacrifice in the Mass his sacramental being. – Ed.
28
29
The ordinary Greek text is:
The Vulgate is:
primus homo de terra, terrenus; secundus homo de cœlis, cœlestis.
Ed.
30
The LXXX Sermons, fol. 1640. – Ed.
31
"Mr. Coleridge's admiration of Bull and Waterland as high theologians was very great. Bull he used to read in the Latin
32
33