origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. // Developmental Psychology 28.5 (1992): 759.
77
Ainsworth M., Blehar M. C., Waters E., Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
78
Spangler G., Grossmann K. E. Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants // Child Development 64.5 (1993): 1439–1450; Hill-Soderlund A. L. et al., Parasympathetic and sympathetic responses to the Strange Situation in infants and mothers from avoidant and securely attached dyads // Developmental Psychobiology 50.4 (2008): 361–376.
79
Bretherton I. Mary Ainsworth: Insightful Observer and Courageous Theoretician // Kimble G. A., Wertheimer M. (eds.). Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology. Vol. 5. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003, http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/pdf/mda_inge.pdf.
80
Ainsworth M., Blehar M. C., Waters E., Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
81
O’Connell A. N., Russo N. F. (eds.). Models of Achievement: Reflections of Eminent Women in Psychology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983. P. 200–219.
82
Ibid.
83
Ainsworth M., Blehar M. C., Waters E., Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
84
Ainsworth M. D. S. Maternal sensitivity scales, 1969, http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/measures/content/maternal%20sensitivity%20scales.pdf.
85
Ibid.
86
Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books, 1988. P. 11.
87
Ibid.
88
Feeney B. C. The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92.2 (2007): 268.
89
В своих ранних работах по оторванности от родителей Боулби описывал ребенка как гомеостатическую систему, настроенную на поиск золотой середины между двумя взаимоисключающими целями: безопасностью и узнаванием нового. Такой подход сформировался у ученого под впечатлением от технологий, появившихся в ходе Второй мировой войны, когда военные использовали примитивные компьютеры для управления механизмами. Эти “кибернетические” устройства могли реагировать по-разному в зависимости от внешних условий. Так появились “умные бомбы” с наведением по радиосигналу и самонаводящиеся торпеды. См.: Shaver Ph., Mikulincer M. Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics and Change. New York: Guilford Press, 2007. P. 219.
90
Bretherton I. The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. // Developmental Psychology 28.5 (1992): 759.
91
Sroufe L. A. et al. The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Guilford Press, 2005. P. 52.
92
Ibid. P. 8.
93
Ibid.
94
Интервью по телефону 14 августа 2013 г.
95
Karen R. Becoming Attached. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. P. 184.
96
Itzendoorn M. et al. The relationship between quality of attachment in infancy and IQ in kindergarten // Journal of Genetic Psychology 1 (1988).
97
Arend R., Gove F., Sroufe A. Continuity of individual adaptation from infancy to kindergarten: A predictive study of ego-resiliency and curiosity in preschoolers // Child Development 4 (1979); Karen R. Becoming Attached. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. P. 185.
98
Sroufe L. A. et al. The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Guilford Press, 2005. P. 126.
99
Ibid. P. 156
100
Jimerson S. et al. A prospective longitudinal study of high school dropouts examining multiple predictors across development // Journal of School Psychology 38 (December 2000); Sroufe L. A. et al. The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Guilford Press, 2005. P. 187.
