Knowledge Database A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Knowledge Database A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 3
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Knowledge Database217
3.2 Change Request: Knowledge Database219
3.3 Change Log: Knowledge Database221
3.4 Decision Log: Knowledge Database223
3.5 Quality Audit: Knowledge Database225
3.6 Team Directory: Knowledge Database227
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Knowledge Database229
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Knowledge Database231
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Knowledge Database233
3.10 Issue Log: Knowledge Database235
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Knowledge Database237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Knowledge Database239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Knowledge Database241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Knowledge Database243
4.4 Risk Audit: Knowledge Database245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Knowledge Database247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Knowledge Database249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Knowledge Database251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Knowledge Database253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Knowledge Database255
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Knowledge Database257
5.4 Lessons Learned: Knowledge Database259
Index261
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
2. What Knowledge database coordination do you need?
<--- Score
3. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
4. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Knowledge database research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
5. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
6. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Knowledge database will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
7. Consider your own Knowledge database project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
8. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
9. Will Knowledge database deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
10. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
11. What Knowledge database events should you attend?
<--- Score
12. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
13. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
14. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
15. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
16. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Knowledge database team, Knowledge database itself?
<--- Score
17. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
18. Are there recognized Knowledge database problems?
<--- Score
19. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
20. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
21. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
22. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
23. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
24. What Knowledge database problem should be solved?
<--- Score
25. Have you identified your Knowledge database key performance indicators?
<--- Score
26. Why the need?
<--- Score
27. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
28. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
29. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Knowledge database delivery, for example is new software needed?