Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
108. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
109. Is the Software AG scope manageable?
<--- Score
110. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
111. What is the context?
<--- Score
112. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
113. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
114. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
115. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
116. Who are the Software AG improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
117. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
119. How do you hand over Software AG context?
<--- Score
120. Will team members perform Software AG work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
121. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
122. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Software AG changes?
<--- Score
123. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
124. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
125. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
126. What is the scope of the Software AG work?
<--- Score
127. What are the Software AG use cases?
<--- Score
128. Will team members regularly document their Software AG work?
<--- Score
129. How will the Software AG team and the group measure complete success of Software AG?
<--- Score
130. Who approved the Software AG scope?
<--- Score
131. Will a Software AG production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
132. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
133. Do you have a Software AG success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
134. Are the Software AG requirements complete?
<--- Score
135. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
136. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Software AG Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
2. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
3. How do your measurements capture actionable Software AG information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
4. Which Software AG impacts are significant?
<--- Score
5. Do you have any cost Software AG limitation requirements?
<--- Score
6. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
7. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
8. What are the Software AG investment costs?
<--- Score
9. What are your key Software AG organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
10. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<---
