Executing Process Group: Google Applications213
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Google Applications215
3.2 Change Request: Google Applications217
3.3 Change Log: Google Applications219
3.4 Decision Log: Google Applications221
3.5 Quality Audit: Google Applications223
3.6 Team Directory: Google Applications225
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Google Applications227
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Google Applications229
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Google Applications231
3.10 Issue Log: Google Applications233
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Google Applications235
4.1 Project Performance Report: Google Applications237
4.2 Variance Analysis: Google Applications239
4.3 Earned Value Status: Google Applications241
4.4 Risk Audit: Google Applications243
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Google Applications245
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Google Applications247
5.0 Closing Process Group: Google Applications249
5.1 Procurement Audit: Google Applications251
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Google Applications254
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Google Applications256
5.4 Lessons Learned: Google Applications258
Index260
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
2. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
3. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
4. Do you know what you need to know about Google applications?
<--- Score
5. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
6. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
7. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Google applications delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
8. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
9. What are your needs in relation to Google applications skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
10. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
11. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
12. Which information does the Google applications business case need to include?
<--- Score
13. What are the particular statistics about workloads, task events and resource utilization, with respect to all applications?
<--- Score
14. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
15. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
16. What Google applications capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
17. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
18. What is the Google applications problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
19. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
20. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
21. What would happen if Google applications weren’t done?
<--- Score
22. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
23. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
24. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
25. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
26. Does Google applications create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
27. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
28. What is the smallest subset of
