Science Foundation. 1974. Twenty-Fourth Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1974. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.B. W. Arden. 1976. The computer science and engineering research study (COSERS). Communications of the ACM, 19(12): 670–673. DOI: 10.1145/360373.360376.
20.B. W. Arden. 1983. What Can Be Automated?: Computer Science and Engineering Research Study. MIT Press.
21.J. A. Feldman and W. R. Sutherland. 1979. Rejuvenating experimental computer science: A report to the National Science Foundation and others. Communications of the ACM, 22(9): 497–502. DOI: 10.1145/359146.359147.
22.D. D. McCracken, P. J. Denning, and D. H. Brandin. 1979. An ACM executive committee position on the crisis in experimental computer science. Communications of the ACM, 22(9): 503–504. DOI: 10.1145/359146.362786.
23.P. J. Denning, E. A. Feigenbaum, P. Gilmore, A. C. Hearn, R. W. Ritchie, and J. F. Traub.1981. A discipline in crisis. Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 370–374. DOI: 10.1145/ 358669.358682.
24.National Science Foundation. May 21–23, 1979. Summary Minutes of the Advisory Subcommittee for Computer Science. Washington, DC.
25.P. J. Denning. 1981. ACM President’s letter: Eating our seed corn. Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 341–343. DOI: 10.1145/358669.358672.
26.J. F. Traub. 1981. Quo vadimus: Computer science in a decade. Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 351–369. DOI: 10.1145/358669.358677.
27.J. Hopcroft, B. Lampson, J. McCarthy, A. Penzias, M. Rabin, J. Schwartz, D. Scott, and A. Van Dam. December 1986. Preliminary Draft Report on the Scientific Contributions of Computer Science. National Science Foundation.
28.J. E. Hopcroft, K. W. Kennedy, and K. K. Curtis. 1989. Computer Science: Achievements and Opportunities. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
29.J. McCarthy. April 13, 1996. A Petition for the Withdrawal of “Computing the Future”. http://jmc.stanford.edu/commentary/petition.html; last accessed 31 December 2018.
30.National Research Council. 1997. Defining a Decade: Envisioning CSTB’s Second 10 Years. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
31.L. Kleinrock. 1998. Toward a National Research Network. National Academies.
32.J. F. Traub and National Research Council. 1988. The National Challenge in Computer Science and Technology. National Academies.
33.Links to CSTB publications can be found here: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/CSTB/ CSTB_042201.
34.National Research Council, 1997.
35.CRA provided three earlier reports: (1) P. Freeman and W. Aspray. 1999. The Supply of Information Technology Workers in the United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED459346. (2) J. Cuny and W. Aspray. 2001. Recruitment and Retention of Women Graduate Students in Computer Science and Engineering. Computing Research Association. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239547208_Recruitment_and_retention_of_ women_graduate_students_in_computer_science_and_engineering. (3) J. Stankovic and W. Aspray. 2003. Recruitment and Retention of Faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. Computing Research Association. http://archive.cra.org/reports/r&rfaculty.pdf.
36.Y. Oyanagi. 1999. Development of supercomputers in Japan: Hardware and software. Parallel Computing, 25: 1545–1567. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8191(99)00084-8.
37.National Research Council. 2005. Getting up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing. National Academies Press.
38.Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering, and P. D. Lax. 1983. Report of the Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering. National Science Foundation. https://www.pnnl.gov/scales/docs/lax_report1982.pdf.
39.K. G. Wilson. 1988. On Supercomputing. In Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering and P. D. Lax. 1983. National Science Foundation. Supplement to the “Report of the Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering,” pp. 24–33.
40.J. F. Decker. 1983. “Report to the Federal Coordinating Council on Science, Engineering and Technology Supercomputer Panel on Recommended Government Actions to Provide Access to Supercomputers.” In Supercomputers, Hearings before the Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, November, vol. 15, p. 16.
41.M. Bardon. 1983. A National Computing Environment for Academic Research. National Science Foundation: Report of an NSF Working Group on Computers for Research.
42.Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. September 7, 1984. Report of the Research Briefing Panel on Computer Architecture, National Academies of Sciences and Engineering and the Institute of Medicine. DOI: 10.17226/19410.
43.Erich Bloch. September 11, 1984. NSF internal memorandum to Carl Hall, AAD/ENG, Marcel Bardon, AAD/MPS, and John Connolly, OD/OASC. Charles Babbage Institute.
44.Kent Curtis, DD/DCR, Blake Cherrington, DD/ECSE, and John Connolly, Head/OASC. September 24, 1984. NSF internal memorandum to Erich Bloch, Director. Charles Babbage Institute.
45.R. Adrion, D. Farber, F. F. Kuo, L. H. Landweber, D. Angel, and J. B. Wyatt. December 1984. SCIENCENET: Report on the Evolution of a National Supercomputer Access Network. National Science Foundation.
46.D. M. Jennings, L. H. Landweber, I. H. Fuchs, D. J. Farber, and W. R. Adrion. 1986. Computer networking for scientists. Science, 231(4741): 943–950. DOI: 10.1126/science.231.4741.943.
47.This quote is from the introduction to the program activities of the Division of Computing Research (DCR) in the Mathematical and Physical Sciences and Engineering (MPE) Directorate. NSF Annual Report, 1975.
48.I applied and was recruited to NSF by Kent Curtis and joined in a “rotator” position. NSF brings academics
