gobies as the families Anoplogastridae and Gobiidae, respectively, these groups clearly differ greatly in diversity, age, and ecological breadth.
In organizing this guide, we have had to face a host of perplexing and often conflicting hypotheses of fish relationships. For chondrichthyan fishes we have elected to follow a somewhat traditional classification of their diversity based primarily on Nelson (2006). Our organization of the ray-finned fishes largely follows the classification provided in Helfman and Collette (2011), which is, in turn, based largely on Nelson (2006), as modified by Wiley and Johnson (2010). Within the Percomorpha, a large group of ray-finned fishes whose relationships remain poorly understood, we have followed the taxonomic levels of Wiley and Johnson (2010) rather than those of Helfman and Collette (2011). In some cases we have modified these classification schemes based on well corroborated studies. However, we have not implemented some recent and radically different classification schemes (e.g., Betancur et al., 2013; Near et al., 2013). We find it difficult and in fact unnecessary to implement certain changes in percomorph classification at this time, and instead treat its hypothesized members in a more or less traditional manner.
Until very recently, our understanding of fish relationships was based almost exclusively on morphological features. With the advent of modern molecular methods, the study of the evolutionary relationships of fishes has grown exponentially, with new studies of various groups appearing at a nearly overwhelming pace. In many cases, the hypotheses generated by these studies conflict with long-held concepts of fish relationships, some to small degrees, others to very great degrees. Too often, these molecular-based phylogenetic hypotheses are not supported by morphology, as the number of molecular-based hypotheses have far outpaced the ability of morphologists to fully explore them (Hastings, 2011). Students of fishes should remember that these published phylogenies are merely hypotheses of relationships, and are subject to testing and refuting. As a consequence of this burgeoning of new ideas about fish relationships, the time is ripe for a morphological renaissance in ichthyology. Emerging molecular hypotheses provide a wealth of testable hypotheses for students with knowledge and expertise in morphology as we continue to refine our understanding of the fish tree of life.
ABOUT THIS BOOK
While ichthyology students often learn regional fish faunas through a series of local field trips, appreciation of the true diversity of fishes is more readily gained by a survey of a wide diversity of preserved specimens from a variety of habitats and from different geographic regions. Consequently our approach in this guide has been to include images of representative preserved specimens, labeled with the most important and easily visible diagnostic characters for the group to which they belong. For several groups, we provide images of more than one species, and in some cases, additional anatomical details to document variation within the group. Each photograph in this book is of a specimen archived in a natural history collection. Because our illustrations are of museum specimens, some are damaged, with broken fins or twisted bodies. This is especially true of many fishes of the deep-sea groups, as they are fragile and frequently damaged by nets during collection. In addition, the preservation methods used by fish collections (fixation in 10% formalin and transfer to alcohol for long-term storage) do not retain the bright colors typical of many living fishes. However, a vast number of images of living and freshly caught fishes are available on the internet, and students are encouraged to use one of the common search engines to locate additional images of groups of fishes of particular interest.
Almost all of the images in this guide are of specimens archived at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Marine Vertebrate Collection (SIO). Details on the collecting locality and other information for each of these specimens are available online at https://scripps. ucsd.edu/collections/mv/. The Marine Vertebrate Collection is an extraordinary resource with over 2,000,000 specimens of fishes from all over the world. This inventory, supplemented by a few specimens from other collections, permitted us to provide coverage of all 78 currently recognized orders of fishes, as well as an additional 92 families of diverse, common, or otherwise interesting groups. While we have a slight bias towards groups found in North American waters, we also illustrate groups from other areas where possible. We are indebted to fish collections at other institutions for a few of the illustrated specimens. These include the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP), California Academy of Sciences (CAS), Cornell University (CU), Tulane University (TU), the University of Arizona (UAZ), and the University of Michigan (UMMZ), as well as our colleague Dave Ebert (DE)
Each primary account also includes an estimate of the group’s diversity based on Eschmeyer and Fong (2013), the approximate distribution of the group (the continents or oceans where they are found), the habitats in which they normally occur (freshwater, coastal marine, oceanic zone), and the portion of the water column where they typically reside (pelagic, neritic, demersal, or benthic). The Remarks section includes information such as the phylogenetic relationships of the group, their reproductive strategies and food preferences, their importance to humans, and in some cases the conservation status of the group. Additional details on the biology of most fishes can be found in the online resource Fishbase (Froese and Pauly, 2000; www.fishbase.org/home.htm). Finally, each account includes a list of some of the most important guides for identification, classic references on the systematics and biology of the group, and recent studies of their phylogeny. We owe a deep debt of gratitude to the late Joseph S. Nelson and his compendium, Fishes of the World, now in its fourth edition (2006). This work proved especially useful in compiling key characters for the groups of fishes represented herein. We also benefitted greatly from several classic references on fishes, too numerous to mention here, as well as a number of online resources, especially Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes (Eschmeyer, 2013; http://research archive.calacademy.org/research/Ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp). Additional details on the biology of most fishes can be found in standard ichthyology texts (e.g., Bond, 1996; Bone and Moore, 2008; Helfman et al., 2009; Moyle and Cech, 2004).
Fishes are fascinating animals and have held our interest for most of our lives. We hope that this general survey of the most speciose group of vertebrates on the planet will provide others a greater appreciation of the amazing diversity of fishes, stimulating interest in them and all things ichthyological.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank several University of California, San Diego students who helped photograph fish specimens and edit the images used throughout this book, especially Matt Soave, Megan Matsumoto, and Corey Sheredy. Matt led the way with his extraordinary photographic and editing skills as well as his hard work and dedication. Several others provided photographic assistance including Dan Conley and John Snow. A number of colleagues provided specimens illustrated in the book either as loans or as gifts to the Scripps Institution of Marine Vertebrate Collection. These include: John Lundberg and Mark Sabaj (Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia), John Sparks and Barbara Brown (American Museum of Natural History), Dave Catania (California Academy of Sciences), Amy McCune (Cornell University), Dave Ebert (Moss Landing Marine Lab), Hsuan-Ching Ho (National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Taiwan), Hank Bart and Nelson Rios (Tulane University), Peter Reinthal (University of Arizona), and Douglas Nelson (University of Michigan). We thank Cindy Klepadlo for curatorial assistance and her support in many ways, Tom Near and Leo Smith for providing information on the phylogeny of fishes, Larry Frank and Rachel Berquist for providing images from the Digital Fish Library project, Leo Smith for providing the excellent osteological image, and the National Science Foundation (DBI-1054085) for funds to purchase the MVC digital radiography system. Bruce Collette, Linn Montgomery, and Jackie Webb thoroughly reviewed an early draft of the book and provided many helpful comments. We would also like to thank the staff of the University of California Press, including Kate Hoffman, Merrik Bush-Pirkle, and Blake Edgar for their professional support and expertise in numerous ways; David Peattie of BookMatters for his patience and skill in formatting the book; and Chuck Crumly for his encouragement to pursue this project. We would also like to thank freelance copyeditor Caroline Knapp. Philip A. Hastings would like to thank Marty L. Eberhardt for her support, encouragement and companionship. H. J. Walker thanks Sonja, Tara,
