War and Slavery in Sudan. Jok Madut Jok
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу War and Slavery in Sudan - Jok Madut Jok страница 13
Other incidents in which the army’s central role in the resurrection of slavery have been reported by several sources including Dinka labor migrants returning from the North, former slaves, and those who were once stationed in Baggara towns as part of the Sudanese army. One strong case implicating the army was the report of many witnesses that a military helicopter was frequently seen landing in Safaha between January and March 1987. This helicopter reportedly brought ammunition for the militias that raided Aweil West throughout the season. Also reported were cases where supplies were transported by trucks from the Baggara town of Abu Matariq to Safaha, where both the army and the militias were stationed. In more recent times, the Murahileen have been seen carrying radio communication systems and heavy artillery, indicating that these tribal militias were no longer traditional cattle rustlers, as claimed by the government, but rather a well-organized force involving the army. Yet the government of Sudan continued to deny the organized role of the army in slave taking, and dismissed slave capturing simply as “usual tribal abduction.”
The linchpin of the government’s attempts to deflect world attention from slavery and other human rights issues in Sudan were the statements of Hassan al-Turabi, the staunch Islamist and chief ideologue of the ruling National Islamic Front. He has been seen as the real power in the government since a military coup brought al-Bashir to power in 1989. In response to reports accusing the Sudanese government of complicity in slavery, al-Turabi has constantly suggested that he found it impossible for slavery to exist in Sudan. He has repeatedly cited Sudanese law, which prohibits slavery, saying that “these allegations were no more than a malicious propaganda initiated by the United States because of the American hate for the Islamic cultural project in Sudan.”19 Judging by the scant attention the world has given to the suffering of South Sudanese, one must say that the efforts of al-Turabi may have been successful in persuading the world community that slavery is not practiced in Sudan. But while he is right about the fact that the Sudanese constitution prohibits slavery and other forms of exploitation, what matters in Sudan is the daily application of the constitution. South Sudanese, due to their race or religion, do not enjoy the protection provided by the constitution, since the laws are applied preferentially.
Another means by which slaves are acquired is through the exploitation of the displaced from the South. A large proportion of the thousands of slaves and hundreds of thousands of the displaced South Sudanese driven into the North by the war in the 1980s were Dinka from northern Bahr el-Ghazal. During the 1987 and 1988 war- and drought-provoked famines in northern Bahr el-Ghazal, which prompted the Dinka to flee to the North through Baggara territory, the Arabs exploited this tragedy to acquire Dinka children by means of deceitful contracts. These were bogus arrangements that the Baggara designed to take children from their poverty-stricken parents and guardians under the pretext that they were being offered light labor roles in exchange for food for the family and money for transport. Some estimates put the number of children acquired in this manner at over 2,000.20
Testimonies of Former Slaves
Many people in Bahr el-Ghazal who witnessed the slave raids and survived them or who escaped from slavery were interviewed between 1997 and 1999. The stories they narrated about their experiences during the raiding and the march to the North provide a tragic account of the slave raids’ impact on the Dinka. The attacks, the burning of villages, the chasing and killing, the looting and destruction of property, and the capture of slaves were described as the most horrific events they had ever witnessed.
Garang Deng Akot is now twenty years old. He had been purchased from his original captor by a cattle-herding and small-scale agricultural Baggara family. He spent eight years working for them grazing cattle and moving with the entire family during the dry season as far as the Sudanese border with Chad. Realizing that his chances of escaping were limited or nonexistent, Garang pretended to have accepted his status as a slave. Within one year after he was acquired, he had earned the trust of his master so much that he was occasionally allowed to take the cattle to grazing areas far away from the village on his own. In March 1999 he found himself alone, and with the help of the changing vegetation, he noticed that he seemed close to the Dinka area, so he decided to escape. He drove the entire herd all day and all night until he found himself in Dinka territory after three days. He informed the Dinka that he had come from across the Kiir River with over two hundred head of Baggara cattle. He told the Dinka that he expected the Arabs to come looking for him and that a raiding party visit might be imminent. He was right. A force of horseback tribesmen had been looking for him all over the grazing plains and stumbled upon tracks which led them to the escaped slave. When they arrived, they clashed