Score
74. Are there recognized Safe Working Load problems?
<--- Score
75. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
76. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
77. What vendors make products that address the Safe Working Load needs?
<--- Score
78. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
79. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
80. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
81. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Safe Working Load project?
<--- Score
82. Do you need to avoid or amend any Safe Working Load activities?
<--- Score
83. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
84. Will Safe Working Load deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
85. What situation(s) led to this Safe Working Load Self Assessment?
<--- Score
86. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
87. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
88. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
89. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
90. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Safe Working Load as an effective investment?
<--- Score
91. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Safe Working Load leader?
<--- Score
92. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
93. Does your organization need more Safe Working Load education?
<--- Score
94. Is it needed?
<--- Score
95. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
96. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
97. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Safe Working Load?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Safe Working Load Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
2. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
3. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
4. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
5. Have all basic functions of Safe Working Load been defined?
<--- Score
6. How do you think the partners involved in Safe Working Load would have defined success?
<--- Score
7. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
8. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
9. What would be the goal or target for a Safe Working Load’s improvement team?
<--- Score
10. How have you defined all Safe Working Load requirements first?
<--- Score
11. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
12. What system do you use for gathering Safe Working Load information?
<--- Score
13. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
14. What is the scope?
<--- Score
15. How does the Safe Working Load manager ensure against scope creep?
<---
