<--- Score
10. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Parameterized testing goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
11. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
12. What are the Parameterized testing tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
13. When is/was the Parameterized testing start date?
<--- Score
14. What happens if Parameterized testing’s scope changes?
<--- Score
15. Do you have a Parameterized testing success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
16. What are (control) requirements for Parameterized testing Information?
<--- Score
17. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
18. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
19. What is the scope of Parameterized testing?
<--- Score
20. Has the Parameterized testing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
21. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
22. What would be the goal or target for a Parameterized testing’s improvement team?
<--- Score
23. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
24. How do you hand over Parameterized testing context?
<--- Score
25. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
26. How will the Parameterized testing team and the group measure complete success of Parameterized testing?
<--- Score
27. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
28. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
29. Have all basic functions of Parameterized testing been defined?
<--- Score
30. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
31. How can the value of Parameterized testing be defined?
<--- Score
32. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
33. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Parameterized testing?
<--- Score
34. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
35. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
36. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
37. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Parameterized testing work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
38. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
39. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
40. Are accountability and ownership for Parameterized testing clearly defined?
<--- Score
41. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
42. What is in scope?
<--- Score
43. What is the scope?
<--- Score
44. Is there a clear Parameterized testing case definition?
<--- Score
45. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
46. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
47. Will team members perform Parameterized testing work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
48. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
49. Are the Parameterized testing requirements complete?
<--- Score
50. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Parameterized testing? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
51. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Parameterized testing leverage and how?
<--- Score
52.
