style="font-size:15px;"> 11. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
12. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
13. Is the scope of Decentralization of power defined?
<--- Score
14. Is Decentralization of power required?
<--- Score
15. How do you think the partners involved in Decentralization of power would have defined success?
<--- Score
16. What system do you use for gathering Decentralization of power information?
<--- Score
17. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Decentralization of power leverage and how?
<--- Score
18. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
19. Is the Decentralization of power scope manageable?
<--- Score
20. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
21. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
22. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
23. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
24. How do you manage unclear Decentralization of power requirements?
<--- Score
25. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
26. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
27. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Decentralization of power?
<--- Score
28. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
29. Are the Decentralization of power requirements testable?
<--- Score
30. What happens if Decentralization of power’s scope changes?
<--- Score
31. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Decentralization of power goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
32. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
33. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
34. Is the Decentralization of power scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
35. What are the core elements of the Decentralization of power business case?
<--- Score
36. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
37. What are the Decentralization of power tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
39. Who is gathering Decentralization of power information?
<--- Score
40. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
41. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
42. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
43. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
44. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
45. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
46. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
47. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
48. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
49. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
50. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
51. How does the Decentralization of power manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
52. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
53. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
54. What would be the goal or target for a Decentralization of power’s improvement team?
<---
