<--- Score
8. Is the Senior software engineer scope manageable?
<--- Score
9. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
10. How are consistent Senior software engineer definitions important?
<--- Score
11. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
12. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Senior software engineer work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
13. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
14. What Senior software engineer services do you require?
<--- Score
15. Has the Senior software engineer work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
16. What funding model is most compatible with the primary use cases?
<--- Score
17. Are improvement team members fully trained on Senior software engineer?
<--- Score
18. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Senior software engineer goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
19. What are the Senior software engineer tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
20. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
21. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
22. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
23. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
24. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
25. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
26. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
27. Is Senior software engineer currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
28. Is special Senior software engineer user knowledge required?
<--- Score
29. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
30. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
31. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Senior software engineer?
<--- Score
32. What would be the goal or target for a Senior software engineer’s improvement team?
<--- Score
33. How do you catch Senior software engineer definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
34. Will your tests require any hardware, connectivity or other infrastructure upgrades or investment?
<--- Score
35. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
36. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
37. How do you think the partners involved in Senior software engineer would have defined success?
<--- Score
38. Have all basic functions of Senior software engineer been defined?
<--- Score
39. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
40. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
41. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Senior software engineer results are met?
<--- Score
43. What are the proper rules for surveillance and for intelligence gathering?
<--- Score
44. Is Senior software engineer linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
45. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
46. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope of Senior software engineer?
<--- Score
48. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
49.
