Status Report: Risk Assessments214
3.2 Change Request: Risk Assessments216
3.3 Change Log: Risk Assessments218
3.4 Decision Log: Risk Assessments220
3.5 Quality Audit: Risk Assessments222
3.6 Team Directory: Risk Assessments225
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Risk Assessments227
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Risk Assessments229
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Risk Assessments231
3.10 Issue Log: Risk Assessments233
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Risk Assessments235
4.1 Project Performance Report: Risk Assessments237
4.2 Variance Analysis: Risk Assessments239
4.3 Earned Value Status: Risk Assessments241
4.4 Risk Audit: Risk Assessments243
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Risk Assessments245
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Risk Assessments247
5.0 Closing Process Group: Risk Assessments249
5.1 Procurement Audit: Risk Assessments251
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Risk Assessments253
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Risk Assessments255
5.4 Lessons Learned: Risk Assessments257
Index259
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
2. What vendors make products that address the Risk assessments needs?
<--- Score
3. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
4. Which information does the Risk assessments business case need to include?
<--- Score
5. Are identifiers selected that uniquely identify a user or device?
<--- Score
6. Does your organization need more Risk assessments education?
<--- Score
7. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
8. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
9. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
10. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
11. Is management aware of or informed about vital security issues?
<--- Score
12. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
13. What does Risk assessments success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
14. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
15. Have you identified your Risk assessments key performance indicators?
<--- Score
16. What is the extent or complexity of the Risk assessments problem?
<--- Score
17. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Risk assessments?
<--- Score
18. Are there recognized Risk assessments problems?
<--- Score
19. Who should resolve the Risk assessments issues?
<--- Score
20. Does the system prevent remote activation of collaborative computing devices?
<--- Score
21. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
22. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
23. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
24. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
25. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
26. Think about the people you identified for your Risk assessments project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
27. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Risk assessments team, Risk assessments itself?
<--- Score
28. What is the Risk assessments problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
29. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<---
