Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. What are the IBM Cloud Object Storage use cases?
<--- Score
101. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
102. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
103. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
104. How did the IBM Cloud Object Storage manager receive input to the development of a IBM Cloud Object Storage improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
106. Has the IBM Cloud Object Storage work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
107. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on IBM Cloud Object Storage?
<--- Score
108. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
109. How do you think the partners involved in IBM Cloud Object Storage would have defined success?
<--- Score
110. Are the IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements complete?
<--- Score
111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
112. When is/was the IBM Cloud Object Storage start date?
<--- Score
113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
114. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
115. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does IBM Cloud Object Storage leverage and how?
<--- Score
116. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
117. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
118. Is IBM Cloud Object Storage currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
119. How have you defined all IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements first?
<--- Score
120. What was the context?
<--- Score
121. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
122. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected IBM Cloud Object Storage results are met?
<--- Score
123. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that IBM Cloud Object Storage brings?
<--- Score
124. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
125. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
126. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
127. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
128. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to IBM Cloud Object Storage changes?
<--- Score
129. What is the scope of the IBM Cloud Object Storage work?
<--- Score
130. What is the scope of IBM Cloud Object Storage?
<--- Score
131. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
132. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the IBM Cloud Object Storage Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
2. What details are required of the IBM Cloud Object Storage cost structure?
<--- Score
3. How can you reduce costs?
<---
