Score
58. How do you manage changes in Software reliability testing requirements?
<--- Score
59. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
60. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
61. What are (control) requirements for Software reliability testing Information?
<--- Score
62. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
63. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
64. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
65. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
66. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
67. What is the scope of Software reliability testing?
<--- Score
68. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
69. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
70. What Software reliability testing services do you require?
<--- Score
71. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
72. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
73. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
74. How do you manage unclear Software reliability testing requirements?
<--- Score
75. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
76. Will a Software reliability testing production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
77. How would you define Software reliability testing leadership?
<--- Score
78. Has a Software reliability testing requirement not been met?
<--- Score
79. Do you all define Software reliability testing in the same way?
<--- Score
80. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
81. What gets examined?
<--- Score
82. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Software reliability testing work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
83. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
84. How do you gather Software reliability testing requirements?
<--- Score
85. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
86. Is the scope of Software reliability testing defined?
<--- Score
87. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
88. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
89. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
90. What happens if Software reliability testing’s scope changes?
<--- Score
91. Has the Software reliability testing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
92. Is Software reliability testing required?
<--- Score
93. What sources do you use to gather information for a Software reliability testing study?
<--- Score
94. What are the core elements of the Software reliability testing business case?
<--- Score
95. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
96. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
97. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Software reliability testing? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
98. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
99. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
100. Is Software reliability testing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
101.
