Who is gathering Automated search and retrieval system information?
<--- Score
5. Will a Automated search and retrieval system production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
6. Is special Automated search and retrieval system user knowledge required?
<--- Score
7. How did the Automated search and retrieval system manager receive input to the development of a Automated search and retrieval system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
8. Is the scope of Automated search and retrieval system defined?
<--- Score
9. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Automated search and retrieval system work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
10. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
11. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
12. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automated search and retrieval system activities?
<--- Score
13. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
14. Has the Automated search and retrieval system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
15. How do you manage changes in Automated search and retrieval system requirements?
<--- Score
16. What is the scope?
<--- Score
17. What is the context?
<--- Score
18. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
19. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
21. Are the Automated search and retrieval system requirements complete?
<--- Score
22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
23. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
24. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
25. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automated search and retrieval system brings?
<--- Score
26. What system do you use for gathering Automated search and retrieval system information?
<--- Score
27. How will the Automated search and retrieval system team and the group measure complete success of Automated search and retrieval system?
<--- Score
28. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
29. Who approved the Automated search and retrieval system scope?
<--- Score
30. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
31. What is the scope of the Automated search and retrieval system work?
<--- Score
32. Why are you doing Automated search and retrieval system and what is the scope?
<--- Score
33. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
34. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automated search and retrieval system study?
<--- Score
35. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
36. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
37. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
38. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
39. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
40. Who are the Automated search and retrieval system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
41. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
42. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
43. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Automated search and retrieval system changes?
<--- Score
45.
