<--- Score
12. What system do you use for gathering Managed Content as a Service information?
<--- Score
13. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
14. Has the Managed Content as a Service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
15. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Managed Content as a Service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
16. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
17. Will a Managed Content as a Service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
18. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
19. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
20. Are the Managed Content as a Service requirements testable?
<--- Score
21. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
22. What Managed Content as a Service services do you require?
<--- Score
23. What would be the goal or target for a Managed Content as a Service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
24. What is the scope?
<--- Score
25. How does the Managed Content as a Service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
26. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
27. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
28. What are the record-keeping requirements of Managed Content as a Service activities?
<--- Score
29. How will the Managed Content as a Service team and the group measure complete success of Managed Content as a Service?
<--- Score
30. What is the scope of Managed Content as a Service?
<--- Score
31. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
32. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
33. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
34. How do you catch Managed Content as a Service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
35. What was the context?
<--- Score
36. How can the value of Managed Content as a Service be defined?
<--- Score
37. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
38. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
39. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
40. How have you defined all Managed Content as a Service requirements first?
<--- Score
41. Will team members regularly document their Managed Content as a Service work?
<--- Score
42. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
43. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
44. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
45. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
46. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
47. What happens if Managed Content as a Service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
48. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
49. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
50. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Managed Content as a Service leverage and how?
<--- Score
51. Who is gathering Managed Content as a Service information?
<--- Score
52. Who approved the Managed Content as a Service scope?
<--- Score
53. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
55. What is out of scope?
<---
