manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
100. What Control Systems Engineer requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
101. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
102. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
103. How do you think the partners involved in Control Systems Engineer would have defined success?
<--- Score
104. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Control Systems Engineer work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
105. How did the Control Systems Engineer manager receive input to the development of a Control Systems Engineer improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
106. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
107. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
108. How do you manage changes in Control Systems Engineer requirements?
<--- Score
109. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
110. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Control Systems Engineer? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
111. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
112. Has a Control Systems Engineer requirement not been met?
<--- Score
113. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
114. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
115. What gets examined?
<--- Score
116. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
117. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
118. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
119. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Control Systems Engineer goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
120. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
121. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
122. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
123. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
124. How would you define Control Systems Engineer leadership?
<--- Score
125. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
126. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
127. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
128. Is there any additional Control Systems Engineer definition of success?
<--- Score
129. Is Control Systems Engineer required?
<--- Score
130. What are the Control Systems Engineer use cases?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Control Systems Engineer Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the cause of any Control Systems Engineer gaps?
<--- Score
2. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
3. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
4. What potential environmental factors impact the Control Systems Engineer effort?
<--- Score
5. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
6. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
7. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<---
