.
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу - страница 8
<--- Score
100. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
101. How will the Web development software team and the group measure complete success of Web development software?
<--- Score
102. How do you hand over Web development software context?
<--- Score
103. What is the scope of Web development software?
<--- Score
104. Who are the Web development software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
105. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
106. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
107. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
108. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
109. What happens if Web development software’s scope changes?
<--- Score
110. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
111. When is/was the Web development software start date?
<--- Score
112. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
113. What was the context?
<--- Score
114. How have you defined all Web development software requirements first?
<--- Score
115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Web development software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
116. How do you catch Web development software definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
117. What is in scope?
<--- Score
118. Is Web development software linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
119. Is the scope of Web development software defined?
<--- Score
120. What is the scope of the Web development software effort?
<--- Score
121. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
122. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
123. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
124. What is the scope?
<--- Score
125. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
126. How do you manage changes in Web development software requirements?
<--- Score
127. Is Web development software required?
<--- Score
128. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
129. Is the Web development software scope manageable?
<--- Score
130. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
131. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
132. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
133. Is special Web development software user knowledge required?
<--- Score
134. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
135. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
136. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
137. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Web development software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree